trial day 48: REBUTTAL #146

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
I'm just tuning in. Did Dr D interview and evaluate Jodi in person?

yes she did and found her a whackadoodle (non clinical term)
 
  • #462
yes.. DT gets surebuttal.. see rebuttal thread for more info (I wish them luck with that <---not really I was being sarcastic there)

No way. A guaranteed rebuttal?
 
  • #463
hey josie: did you eat that ice cream? I am waiting for you to pass it around already!

i stopped halfway in cause i felt bad and kinda sick :floorlaugh:
 
  • #464
I just got home. I bet Jodi is seething about having someone prettier than her on the stand.
 
  • #465
Another great thing about JD is that some of the things that Juan brought up on cross with RS/ALV, like sending her books or apologizing for reading her journals didn't seem like particularly salient points to me, or if they did I thought the defenses they gave seemed plausible. But seeing JD, a true professional with true professional standards of behavior, react to those things ads so much weight to the accusation of impropriety by RS and ALV.

Oh they were very salient indeed because unlike RS and ALV who were haughty and annoyed with JM's questioning of this, Dr. D. not only explained that it was wrong but, more importantly, explained WHY it was wrong (if one was to perform an unbiased evaluation) - which is what RS and ALV were SUPPOSED to do but, apparently, they never got the memo.
 
  • #466
Ok, so I just got home. On the way I was able to listen to some of the HLN testimony. Thank God they are so far behind.

But what I did hear of this witness...WOW...

Clinical, precise, stick to the facts. The way and expert witness is supposed to be.

Feels like the good guys got a win with this witness!

I haven't heard all that went on this morning, just picking up here and review later. Any big 'news' besides JA has a personality disorder???

K
 
  • #467
JW just sharpened JA's pencil for her. :floorlaugh:
 
  • #468
  • #469
Mine too.
My legal name is J. Lotus Pawprint - my parents were hippies with a touch of formal ;) :genie:

Ha! I have two uncles, J. David and J. Roy
 
  • #470
Awwww....even Mike like's the Dr.
 
  • #471
This is what Juan and Dr. DeMarte are driving this afternoon!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 7
  • #472
Jodi back to looking very childish and is probably going to continue to ignore what's going on in court. :rolleyes:
 
  • #473
Uhhh, did Jodi just have Wilmott sharpen a pencil for her??
 
  • #474
No way. A guaranteed rebuttal?

But can't they only touch on whatever Juan touches on? (I know, good luck with that lol)

Ugh now the trial is going to go on until June
 
  • #475
I feel like someone like JA would be annoyed that they couldn't manipulate someone into believing them and DeMarte's testimony reflects that disbelief. lol. She paid much more attention to her own experts and she knew what they were going to be saying.

Someone - and I'm sorry I can't remember who - said it was a defense ploy. The defendant pays attention to her own witnesses, and then acts indifferent, or ignores, the opposition's witnesses. Supposedly to show the opposition's witnesses are not important. Sorry, JA - not working!!
 
  • #476
  • #477
Aww Jenni sharpen her little pencil for her.
 
  • #478
She just REFUSES to acknowledge the Dr.... wow
 
  • #479
You know, when someone is obviously ACTING like they are not paying attention when someone is talking about them, they are likely LISTENING to every word - don't know why I felt that important to say at this moment in time...
 
  • #480
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
2,367
Total visitors
2,431

Forum statistics

Threads
632,251
Messages
18,623,872
Members
243,066
Latest member
DANTHAMAN
Back
Top