Wouldn't Reeva have heard Oscar approaching on his stumps? I can't imagine he could be stealth quiet.
Those long hands in your sig look creepily familiar. It's not JA is it, please?
Wouldn't Reeva have heard Oscar approaching on his stumps? I can't imagine he could be stealth quiet.
Maybe Reeva got into the bath shortly after arriving, and that gave OP time on his own to do some browsing? It could explain why Reeva had (probably) changed from jeans into shorts, but doesn't explain her still being in the same vest/tank top (if it was the same one she arrived in).
Reeva ate very late. If she had eaten an earlier, heavy dinner I'd have thought that would have been present in her system too. It makes me think that for most of the night they were lovemaking, snacking and then rowing.
Thank you both for the question and answer. I was wondering that myself.
It could be to provide clarification that they were both OP's iPads. One was an iPad 3 and one an iPad 2, so there's a possibility that he got a new one, and simply transferred the bookmarks/favourites from one to the other.maybe 2 ipads in synch means it was definitely op using them.
Thank you both for the question and answer. I was wondering that myself.
I put it to you. . that the best is yet to come, if I may be allowed that undignified phrase.. Nel has left himself loads of time to go thru with a fine tooth comb all the defence witnesses.. he has his exhibits tabled, , about 80% of them. some more to come of a highly significant nature .. it will be Roux's turn to present and produce his witnesses, let them tell their story, then step back and hear Nel extract from them probably even more damaging testimony in its peculiar way..
Oscar himself will be front and centre.. after all, he is he defendant, the accused.. in his bail statement he made 30% of it about his feelings for Reeva.. the love and all that.. this will be explored by the prosecutor. among so many other things..
all thru the trial, nels has been laying the foundation for the other charges against him, presenting prima facie evidence as well. in the police witnesses testimony.. Fresco, Samantha et al. the owners of Tasha restaurant... the gun supplier..
charges to which he has to answer to.
Ok, so if that's pretty much the State's case other than a few loose ends they want to pull together this weekend ...I'm not impressed that they have proved beyond a reasonable doubt that this was premeditated murder. And they really did nothing to address whether Oscar reasonably feared imminent harm - did they?
Not completely consistent unless Reeva peed standing up and facing the door....
Maybe Reeva got into the bath shortly after arriving, and that gave OP time on his own to do some browsing? It could explain why Reeva had (probably) changed from jeans into shorts, but doesn't explain her still being in the same vest/tank top (if it was the same one she arrived in).
Reeva ate very late. If she had eaten an earlier, heavy dinner I'd have thought that would have been present in her system too. It makes me think that for most of the night they were lovemaking, snacking and then rowing.
At some point it was claimed, that there was a loud argument just after the arrival of both OP and Reeva, lasted 1 hour.![]()
At some point it was claimed, that there was a loud argument just after the arrival of both OP and Reeva, lasted 1 hour.![]()
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/world/africa/oscar-pistorius-trial-third-day/A second witness, another of Pistorius' neighbors, told the court Tuesday she also was awoken by shouting on the night Steenkamp was killed. In brief testimony, Estelle van der Merwe said she heard loud voices that went on for about an hour and put a pillow over her head to try to get back to sleep. She said she heard four sounds but could not be sure what they were.
I'm confused. I always thought it was OP who claimed Reeva died in his arms. Although, the pathologist said she'd have only taken a few breaths after the head shot, so it's highly doubtful that she died anywhere other than the toilet floor, exactly where he shot her.
Oscar himself says he approached tha bathroom door yelling, I think....
Quite correct regarding search history. There can be thousands of clues within this information, prior to the murder. Information that may substantiate Oscar's story, movements and relationship. Both the state and prosecution would be foolish not to look at this information.I don't know why it would make anyone laugh? That was the search term investigators missed in the computer forensics of Casey Anthony - whom, of course, was acquitted for the 2008 murder of her nearly 3 year old daughter Caylee. They'd only searched IE history, not Firefox, which came to light post-acquittal.
My point is - one never knows what could be obtained. So best to be thorough.
I didn't know about that one. I only knew about something being heard about an hour before the shooting. When the people across the road were woken up first time, and the lady put the pillow over head to block out the noise?