It's natural to be defensive after the Burgers were accused of colluding with each other. Doesn't mean anything except that she's aware of how Roux implied over and over and over that the Burgers testimony was embellished. I would fully accept Stipps would be anticipating a grilling and to react accordingly. Would be odd not to.He asked her, "have you discussed this with your husband?"
She answers, "yes, I don't think that's odd..." In a defensive manner. That's the sort if answer you give when you are already anticipating being accused of collusion. I think it makes the witnesses look bad if they are cooperative with one side and not the other. It makes them seem partial.
It's natural to be defensive after the Burgers were accused of colluding with each other. Doesn't mean anything except that she's aware of how Roux implied over and over and over that the Burgers testimony was embellished. I would fully accept Stipps would be anticipating a grilling.
What a ridiculous thing. Defence saying her memory failed as she 'forgot' the dogs barking, but not producing any evidence the dogs ever barked in the first place.....
The dogs didn't bark, did they?
What a ridiculous thing. Defence saying her memory failed as she 'forgot' the dogs barking, but not producing any evidence the dogs ever barked in the first place.....