Joe Expert, not only used a model 20 cm short than the accused but he took the photo from a point below, a perspective and angle that would further diminish the height as perceived by the observer at that point. The Stipps perspective was on the same plane as the accused, not below.
VERDICT: TOTAL DECEPTION
He is fine, if something does not involve math, memory or accuracy.
Hope he gets a double fee
"Who the f&$# is this guy and where did you find him! Imma break your legs"
He might end up having to pay them LOL
Joe Expert, not only used a model 20 cm short than the accused but he took the photo from a point below, a perspective and angle that would further diminish the height as perceived by the observer at that point. The Stipps perspective was on the same plane as the accused, not below.
VERDICT: TOTAL DECEPTION
Wow, he doesn't have a TV, doesn't have a radio, doesn't read newspapers, hasn't followed the trial. Doesn't like outside influences.
He should be on a jury, not the witness stand!
Is it nearly time for tea?
I have a packet of chocolate hobnobs calling me.......