Not what I said...
She has factors to weigh. Him being without his legs and feeling vulnerable is one of them.
Oh my lord. We now have women trying to sound like oscar sounding like a woman.
Personally, being based a lot on English Common Law as it is, I don't see it is straight forward. More straight forward are Roman law countries where most things are written into law and there is little room for precedents. Those do, as you say, "follow in a linear fashion", but where is the linear fashion here where a lot of reasoning and interpretation is tasked to the judge as it would be to a jury ?
Like this witness! Boy can she scream! (or was that a cry?)
as I said,, its pointless discussing this with you.
LOL how to prove OP screams like a woman........get 2 women to scream in court
Respectfully, nonsense. He was an amputee before he murdered. There are literally thousands of criminals that are amputees that are serving their sentences in prison right now. Just being an amputee is not a "get out of jail free card."
But he was as you say "vulnerable" or he felt that way and that is truly something unique, special if you will. Yup, he's going to get away with murder because he felt "vulnerable." I follow you there. LOL!
The witness MN is black so I don't understand the "racism" he demonstrated, rather he felt the impoliteness and informality of a policeman saying "Hey brother, what happened here?" I would not accept that whether in the 3 countries I have experience with the police in, i.e. the UK, Spain or India where they are even overly polite.Generations of overt and oppressive racism change a person. The lens through which they view the world, reasonably but unfortunately, involves the "presumption of racism" toward them in every word and deed from others No doubt, racism is still as active as it is in the US, just more subtle and under the radar - except for the person the receiving end, that is!
Yes. There's no evidence to back up his testimony, because OP never bothered to report all these occasions when he was a 'victim' of crime, and yet he's using these incidents to back up his story that he was paranoid about intruders.IIRC there is little to no evidence to back that testimony up. For example, would you think it reasonable to not remember who you called after someone shot at you while you were driving at night if that is one of the incidents you are referring to.