Trial Discussion Thread #45 - 14.07.3, Day 36

[zwiebel]

N: Then accused was careful, before he entered the passage..

D: I do know that.

N: Is he still under that response?

D: He wld have heightened levels stress response hormones. As I understand it from the literature.

 

[kaos]

This docs a fighter. Excellent , this is making it much more interesting

Definitely more interesting than listening to his well spoken monologues of the past couple of days.

 

[soozieqtips]

Midnight Oil?

Only the Aussies will understand...

Not only the Aussies. It was a hit in the UK too :smile:

 

[zwiebel]

D: Milady, I can't make head or tail of that (Nel's last question).
Nel repeats.
D repeats he doesn't understand.

Judge: Try again Mr Nel.

 

[zwiebel]

D: I am aware that there were three noises...

N: You said time was important..

D: Milady, I'm not going to take-answer questions I don't understand.

 

[G.bng]

I would think that a "startle" is merely the first in a chain, i.e. the trigger that puts in motion a "fight or flight" response which could, or would depending on the situation, include a series of different actions that follow on from each other.

 

[PrimeSuspect]

Witness is aware of three noises.

 

[kaos]

Can Nel ask that the Professor is treated as a hostile witness?

 

[zwiebel]

N: Would one startle explain whole sequence of events....and you said no, you would have expected more than one startle.

D: I did say that....I'm already aware there were 3...he's trying to get me to deviate...

Judge steps in to ask witness to let Mr Nel ask questions.

Witness now arguing with judge.

 

[zwiebel]

Witness continuing to lecture judge in her own court.

 

[Suthrnqt]

Can Nel ask that the Professor is treated as a hostile witness?

I was wondering the same.

 

[zwiebel]

What a pompous man.

D: Okay, Please let's try again. (to Nel)

 

[katydid23]

Witness:"My mind is already influenced by the fact that I already now that there are 2 other noises coming"



OH OH ---not very objective on his part ...he automatically assumes what OP told him as FACT

 

[zwiebel]

N: When wld response on first startle have moved out of fight response?

D: I'm not in a position to answer that.

 

[jay-jay]

This professor keeps referring to the startles and noises as 'fact' :facepalm:

 

[katydid23]

I said yesterday that I thought this guy was arrogant and full of himself...and he has proven me correct...Nel is playing him like a fiddle

illowfight:

 

[zwiebel]

N: He was clearly thinking therefore thinking brain in charge again?

D: No. I don't think it's an 'either or'...

 

[PrimeSuspect]

verreaction:

 

[jay-jay]

Witness:"My mind is already influenced by the fact that I already now that there are 2 other noises coming"



OH OH ---not very objective on his part ...he automatically assumes what OP told him as FACT

Snap!

 

[zwiebel]

N: F and F would not explain his actions?

D says it's a statement. Won't answer.