eimajjjj
New Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2014
- Messages
- 196
- Reaction score
- 1,233
There's been a round-up program on Sky News every day after the trial and now and then they have this South African lawyer on it. He's nothing like Booth or any of the other experts who comment on the trial, he's quite blunt: OP is guilty. And it's hilarious how much this perturbs the broadcaster who has to allow a bit of mystery, objectivity and discussion on the show.
On one of the first days commentary, he was asked what he would do if he were the defence and his reply was: I would have pleaded guilty to begin with, shown remorse and hoped for a lenient sentence. The last time he was on he was literally laughing at the absurdity of the latest witnesses and attempt to bring in general 'disability means likely to murder' scenarios.
It was from him that I got the 'verdict must have been reached a long time ago' I mentioned in a previous post as he said those words verbatim.
Don't underestimate the need of media, experts and commentators to pretend there's a mystery on what this verdict will be just to keep ratings high.
It's a pretty open-shut case for us all and has been said as such by experts brave enough in the media.
On one of the first days commentary, he was asked what he would do if he were the defence and his reply was: I would have pleaded guilty to begin with, shown remorse and hoped for a lenient sentence. The last time he was on he was literally laughing at the absurdity of the latest witnesses and attempt to bring in general 'disability means likely to murder' scenarios.
It was from him that I got the 'verdict must have been reached a long time ago' I mentioned in a previous post as he said those words verbatim.
Don't underestimate the need of media, experts and commentators to pretend there's a mystery on what this verdict will be just to keep ratings high.
It's a pretty open-shut case for us all and has been said as such by experts brave enough in the media.