Glad you cancelled, Zwiebel...we would have had to cut your pay. :laughing::loveyou:
Several earlier theories regarding yawning have been disproved by controlled studies, including that it indicates a need for more oxygen or less carbon dioxide in one's system.
I'll complain to my union!
O/T Mr Z just returned, started cheering because he managed to time it for lunchbreak. He wants to play music and make the dog bark. He is definitely teasing me today.
A yawn is considered to be a reflex. Lots of theories and lots of studies related to what causes yawning. Known things that can increase yawning are: tiredness and lack of sleep, certain illnesses such as Multiple Sclerosis, certain medications such as tranquilzing type of drugs - including SSRIs used to treat depression, and stress
Several earlier theories regarding yawning have been disproved by controlled studies, including that it indicates a need for more oxygen or less carbon dioxide in one's system.
Nel wants lunch. Did he say half an hour?
I think this is the case law Nel was referring to.
http://criminallawza.net/2014/05/17/pistoriuss-third-defence-pathological-incapacity-insanity/
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2002/24.html
At first I thought he was saying "E, D" :blushing:
Sorry, this bit confused me - talking about state witness who wanted a translator, English wasn't first language?
Will the verdict be today?
The point is that the defence accepted that EVDM heard arguing, just that they were trying to say that she was mistaken in it coming from OP's house. Had they said she must've been mistaken in hearing it at all would've been better for their version, but no, they did actually accept that she heard arguing .. just that it may have been from another house (which, clearly in the light of what happened that night, i.e. a woman being shot and killed, is highly coincidental that there would've been an argument in another house, at the exact same time that exact same night .. there's not exactly that many houses around there, and most of them testified as witnesses and it wasn't they who were arguing that night, so that leaves very little others houses were it could've been but for OP's!) The defence should've just said EDVM must've been completely mistaken about what she heard, but they couldn't, because the evidence is overwhelming.
Roux: The fact is, you never heard any arguing.
VDMW: I did.
Roux: Or, let me put it to you again, take you back, all you heard was a, I'm reading it again, (reads Afrikaans), now translated, that was (reads Afrikaans): You heard a woman's voice, you could not hear the words or the language spoken, and it was "far from your house". That is what you heard.
VDMI: Yes, that's what I said, but I must say that I know a woman's voice, and there's many movements between a woman's voice, especially when we become angry, or cross my lady.
Roux: But here it's far away, you can't hear words, you can't hear language.
VDMI: To tell the honest truth, my lady, I do not know from which direction those sounds were coming from because our time at home is to... to fall asleep.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.