Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #681
Ulrich Roux @ulrichroux · 6s
Masipa:"The fact that person in the toilet was Reeva and not an intruder,is irrelevant.The accused had the intention to kill
 
  • #682
would a reasonable man act in the same way?
 
  • #683
Love the "dot dot dot" instead of "suspension dots"!
 
  • #684
why isn't OP puking now?
 
  • #685
Was it proven that time elapsed between the shots? If, so, would she have cried out after the first shot & he would have immediately realized it was HER behind the door.
 
  • #686
Is she holding the door to an open season on intimate partner homicide? As long as there is an "OP" defense? We can hold that discussion for now, obviously. But just wonderin...

It seems so, as long as the accused has a "reasonably possibly true" story than most circumstantial evidence may be disregarded...I wonder if Gerard Baden-Clay in the SA courts would have been acquitted. His defense that his wife was suicidal and that the doubts about his untruthful and evasive testimony, taken from the accused best perspective, may have been not pointed to his guilt. Ugh.
 
  • #687
J:...in oresent case accused is only oerson who can say what his state of mind was...has not admitted he intended to shoot and kill anyone, but court entitled to look...at presence or abscence of intention...
 
  • #688
would another reasonable person in OP place have acted in the same way?

Good question.
 
  • #689
  • #690
No evidence that OP's didn't believe that there was an intruder in the bathroom who threatened his and Reeva's safety
 
  • #691
J:...in oresent case accused is only oerson who can say what his state of mind was...has not admitted he intended to shoot and kill anyone, but court entitled to look...at presence or abscence of intention...

Or accused testimony.

I will stop heckling...sorry
 
  • #692
He acted unlawfully!!!!
 
  • #693
Judge is saying there is no evidence OP did not honestly believe there were intruders. Listing reasons, including bthroom window being open, but.... he acted unlawfully.
 
  • #694
Oh God I've got to go out soon... Is it my imagination or is this going to wrap up a whole lot sooner than we imagined?!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • #695
Evidence doesn't support dolus eventualis.

Now it comes down to culpable homicide
 
  • #696
Was it proven that time elapsed between the shots? If, so, would she have cried out after the first shot & he would have immediately realized it was HER behind the door.

J Masipa believes that after the first shot in the hip, Reeva was unable to scream or make a sound.
 
  • #697
She is saying he could be reasonably expected to be fully aware of the consequences of pulling that trigger four times...
 
  • #698
Can you pass the bottle over this way for a sec? Pretty :please:

And some over here please! Oh wait its 11:30am and I'm at work.... Can someone pass the Sprite?
 
  • #699
J: evidence does not support state's contention of Dolus eventualis..saying because OP told ppl straight afterward he did not mean to kill Reeva, it's evidence he did not...
 
  • #700
he's going to get time served.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
3,390
Total visitors
3,485

Forum statistics

Threads
632,466
Messages
18,627,174
Members
243,162
Latest member
detroit_greene915
Back
Top