Older post, trying again -
Nel's now playing to Masipa obvious weakness now for emotive displays of ‘remorse’. Vorster, Lortzenburg etc. proved he was genuinely highly emotional.
Nel spent a long time on the money that Steenkamp accepted. He tries to characterise the money “offered”, to a “financially destitute family”, and most importantly the exact time a larger amount by the accused was given - between judgement and sentence - as opportunistic by Pistorius to sway sentencing.
Nel suggests that it could have been given after the sentencing but by the timing and the ‘silencing’ he sees it as trying to buy justice.
Especially in regard to the stipulation alleged that Pistorius gave the money on a ‘confidiential’ stipulation.
Nel says repeatedly that makes him “sad” that the money was an issue, that it was used against a relatively struggling couple - it almost makes it seems that he had no idea there was an agreement between the Steenkamps and Pistorius.