Diamond met with Ross, at least once, IIRC.
hope the Diamond mystery is resolved..I am sure he is being paid anyway at least most of his fee less testifying.
Diamond met with Ross, at least once, IIRC.
I've been looking for Leanna's police interview on the day of Cooper's death. The prosecutor's asked her to agree that she would seem odd to an objective outsider. She explained how she was in a daze. Can anyone tell me where I can find it? Was it played during the trial? If so, when during the trial? Thanks so much!
Prosecutor Jesse Evans does the cross-examination. "Show me one piece of paper that documents what you've done in terms of a report," Evans says.
Moulton says he has not written a report. Evans seems incredulous. "$20,000 and not one single report."
He is referring to Moulton's earlier testimony about what he has billed for his work on the case.
Evans refers to a phone conversation between him and Moulton. He asks Moulton whether he declined to talk to Evans and his investigator about his impending testimony.
Moulton acknowledges that he did decline to talk about certain specific things that he had covered with the defense, which is employing him.
Diamond met with Ross, at least once, IIRC.
It looks like Dr Diamond did not want his years of study and research on FBS destroyed by RH. Good for him.
I'm thankful he is not testifying for one reason. I do not want to see criminals kill babies in hot cars and use FBS as their defense.
Sure they did. Yesterday. Dr. Brewer.
Okay he's done…What's next?
Seems the Judge is granting a 10 minute recess so the defense can figure out what they want to do next (paraphrasing).
There is going to have to be a lot of synthesizing information and putting it in an understandable narrative for the attorneys' closing arguments.
I think Brewer was enough. Think about it:
The first inquiry for the jury is very simple: - Did Ross deliberately murder his son or did he forget him in the car?
I think when all of the state's evidence is considered, there are not many people who thought the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Ross planned this and deliberately murdered his son. This is the most circumstantial of circumstantial cases - the only thing the State presented is a possible motive, and that evidence was weak.
The jurors just need to be given an alternative and an explanation that this same thing happens every summer by accident and Ross' case is no different, and there's even scientific research that explains it.
The defense doesn't have to prove anything. They don't have to put on an equal amount of evidence proving it wasn't intentional. They on,y have to raise the doubt, and they have done that through a list of witnesses who never saw any hostility or resentment in the father/son relationship and with an expert to explain how people can tragically forget something so important.
The harder question for the jury will be whether forgetting Cooper was caused by criminal negligence.