Well, that was NOT what I expected out of the defense. I expected a steady stream of countless witnesses testifying to how wonderful of a father Ross was, some---but not as many as I expected. I expected some really meaty testimony about FBS, didn't get it. Brewer's testimony was NOT ENOUGH to convince the jury it is possible he forgot Cooper. Yes, it is the prosecution's job to prove the crime, but it was also the defense's obligation to prove he forgot Cooper. Remember, jurors are people: mothers, fathers, grandparents, siblings. The average person does not "talk about all the time" hot car deaths and FBS. Many of them, like the majority of the population, immediately think "that's impossible." Research proves that FBS exists, but to the average person, they would need this research thrown in their face to believe it. The defense did NOT do an adequate job at it. I think it will be very hard for the jury to determine that Ross forgot Cooper---so the only other possible reason is deliberation.
In all, the defense case was very, very weak. I felt the prosecution was also weak, so the question is, who the heck did a better job with their mediocre presentations.
I will say that rebuttal witness really topped off the trial.
I will say that until today, I thought malice would be a stretch. However, the defense did not adequately put the forgotten baby theory OUT THERE so that regular folks (like the jury) would buy into it. I think we will get a malice murder verdict. I really do.