I'm a lurker, but found my old password because I'm busting to note two things:
In Derstine's cross-examination of McClintic, he "suggested to her" that she presented Tori as a gift to Rafferty and that Tori was taken for a random drug debt. But that Rafferty refused.
Does this theory not mean that Rafferty - by his own lawyer's admission - knew that the child was kidnapped from the get-go?
And since in Canada, a person can be found guilty of first degree murder if it happens during a kidnapping - his own lawyer implicated him....?
[I noted that Derstine backed away from that theory somewhat during his closing...]
Also -I hate to chime in with such a distressing detail, but there was one single detail in McClintic's confession to Smythe that made me believe her story. I don't imagine it's something that will come up in the trial, because it is not something a lawyer would want to go anywhere with...
But... when McClintic was describing what happened, she said MR was ... please god forgive me... "preparing" himself (with his hand, down his pants....) as he drove into the secluded spot.... I thought to myself, this is a horrifying detail that could never, never have been "just thought up."
JMO....
It's such a sick detail, and yet, it rings so true, if you dare imagine the horror that allegedly happened there.