Dead bodies don't sweat. So he probably had passed within that hour.
Idk
Other witness's described Cooper as being in wet clothes. Perhaps that is what she meant.
Dead bodies don't sweat. So he probably had passed within that hour.
Idk
She's kind of a lousy witness...a lot of forgetting.
It takes a while for rigor mortis to set in.
If you want to be a bachelor without having to make payments; Then wouldn't you kill the wife first and then give the kid up for adoption.
Or kill both.
So why would he kill only his toddler for the sake of being a bachelor?
That doesn't make sense to me.
So your waiting for evidence that he "said" or he "wrote" that he was going to bake his toddler to death in the family car (oven)?I don't think there's any question that it's negligent to forget your baby in a car all day. But I think the question in this trial is whether he intentionally and purposely killed Cooper by leaving him to roast in a hot car all day. I don't think there's any way he did this deliberately. I wouldn't be bothered if he's convicted for negligently causing Cooper's death, but I've seen and heard nothing that suggests that he knowingly left Cooper in the car to kill him.
Should he have remembered Cooper was in the car? Of course he should have! Should he have seen Cooper's head in the car seat when he did the u-turn or got out of the car? Well, if he forgot about Cooper being in the car, he's not looking closely behind him at the car seat to check on Cooper, so it looks as though he did not see Cooper back there because he wasn't paying attention.
Would it make it any more excusable if his attention was diverted by the news on the radio or a work issue or because he spilled coffee on himself and directed all of his attention to the growing stain on his trousers? It doesn't matter WHY he forgot or what distracted him - it only matters whether he actually did forget or if he left Cooper there specifically to kill him.
I hope they include a recreation of where Cooper's head could have been if he had fallen asleep and slumped down in his seat.
Doing some hurricane prep but wondering if this trial is televised? Thanks.
I think the birthdate shown for JH was in the year 1980, making him thirty four years old at the time of Cooper's death.
Putting that aside, he's shown that he's capable of holding down a steady job, works in a field that requires brains, demonstrated that he can drop his son off at day care on a regular basis, smart enough to google pets in hot cars only days before Cooper was left in a car to bake to death. Presumably he carried on his so-called double life for months or even years without putting Cooper in danger at all. There is no reason to believe he's incapable of handling his life's responsibilities. I think it comes down to his own admission that he simply doesn't have a conscience. "Don't you have a conscience?" "Nope." His words.