How did the juveniles got demolished? As far as I can tell they didn't even get prison time.
This is now, and will forever be, on their records. They will never be able to hold a respectable job or even volunteer with youth. They won't be able to grow up and be soccer coaches, basketball coaches, Watchdog dads at their kid's schools.
That's demolished, in my opinion. It's also likely they won't be able to get through a very long probation - 7 years is a LONG time - without some other brush with a cop for underage drinking, that sort of thing, and then their probation can be revoked. And they can go to prison.
This is an awful, awful story, but I don't think it was obvious to the very youngest of these perps that what they were doing was actually illegal. The lawyer in the last trial admonished the jury to not pay much attention to the fact that the victim was laughing and encouraging them in most of the video - she still, in fact, did not have legal standing to give consent. They weren't acting in her "best interests" at the time, according to the lawyer.
I'm just terribly torn on this, where the juveniles with no prior criminal record are concerned. How many knew her age? (I don't know, is why I'm asking). I know ignorance of her age is no legal excuse, but it makes a difference to me. A girl who's laughing and encouraging them might not look like the crime it turned out to be, to the youngest of the perps.
This is much more complicated - in my opinion - than a case of a girl who's captured and it's obvious to all participants that what's taking place is a crime. I don't think it was obvious to many, at the time.
Vulgar and unholy, yes. But I'm not sure all knew they were participating in a crime.