If one of my neighbors children were found that way, I'd have no qualms about allowing LE into my home. I wouldn't want them to waste one minute wondering if I had anything to hide. I'd rather they put their energy into something useful.
News 8 WFAA played part of the raw interview with MM.
Entire uncut video on WFAA website.
He's not sure LE wants him to disclose the last time she was seen.
I'm the kind of parent who is over the top protective. Admittedly. Mine do not play out front without supervision and never have. I volunteered every single day at their schools. Yes, every single day. I am the first to look down my nose at what I perceive to be bad parenting.
That being said, I've also been witness to media coverage after a murder and seen people interviewed who knew nothing about the victim or what transpired. They were simply in the same school as the victim, but were reported to be "close friends". The things they said were simply not true, but everyone close to the victim was too devastated to be all over tv telling everything they knew. I was appalled to see them come inside bragging about how they were going to be on tv! It really opened my eyes to how the media will grab anyone standing around for their perspective.
According to MM (in the interview last night), she told him she was going to a friend's house. So they knew where she was going. Should they have watched her get there? Should they have confirmed that she made it there and expected a phone call from said neighbor saying she was on her way home? I certainly would have, but again, I'm considered a "helicopter" parent by many.
As a parent, we can't win. We are either smothering them or neglectful with no in-between for most on the outside looking in.
Why is that?
As someone up above said. The perp knows the last time she was seen.
That's strange. I know of men who have to pay child support for non-biological children because they were legally married to the mother at the time, thus considered legal fathers.
I am so impressed! WS peeps are true detectives. All the ideas about the cooler, blue cloth. Yup, any of them make sense. Thanks!
I think we have enough ideas for the TP as possibilities of what could be the need to get TP.
What now?
Do they always say not to worry? Isolated incident?
If you look at the Josh Powell case, they knew so much. It seems enough to arrest him, but I guess it wasn't.
Since the Caylee case, I think LE is very thorough on what they do. No one wants that debacle again.
So we are awaiting the results of WS peeps who are going to test the theory of accident or on purpose for the body from the truck.
To me it is crazy they have the license plate of a red truck, but no news on that?
A van without hubcaps? That would seem easy to ID.
She could have been violated in a van. Where?
The window would be between 5- maybe 6:45. Then clean up and disposal.
A time when most people are home, in and out. Sounds like lots of activities in the community. Walkers. Runners. Etc
I still see no reason that it cannot be stated what the last time was that she was seen.
If someone is confessing, there are plenty of other details that LE knows that they can ask the confessor in order to eliminate him or her.
The public has given lots of help in the past. The Unabomber was solved by the brother, for instance. Somer Thompson by former roommates of the perp. Mothers turned in their own children.
Anyway, here is the uncut version of MM speaking
http://www.wfaa.com/home/related/fu...rl-house-gallagher-polyamorous-214914931.html
RSBM and BBM If they had a missing child they may have went around the neighborhood asking to enter. This one is a bit backwards then many missing kids since we had a body then a report. The manner of death may not have been very messy so just looking in the home would not tell them anything. Many of the things they took from the family's home is stuff that many people have. A perp confident enough to take Alanna, kill her and dump her body all in daylight is IMO more then confident enough to let police in acting as if they did nothing wrong.
I'm reminded of Breann Rodriguez. She was the little girl riding her bike outside with her brother. One of their neighbors, Shawn Morgan, father of 3, snatched her and her bike. He then suffocated her with a plastic bag. Didn't do anything else sexually or otherwise. He dumped her bike training wheels and participated in the searches for her. She has a thread here too on Websleuths.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/breeann-ro...charged-murder/story?id=14297243#.Ud2V19Lkua8
I am a bit baffled by this. Maybe though, they just told him not to discuss "details"?
Or maybe they just want the "perp" to think they are clueless hoping "he" will think he's safe and maybe that confidence would lead a misstep or something?
Ok, as hubs will say, "try not to think so much!" LOL It's hard knowing so little and causes us to analyse every little thing.
im trying to catch up, forgive me if this hss been addressed. in mosft states, the legal husband is put on a birth certificate, regardless of the biological situation. fascinating court cases have popped up due to this( imo) bizarre law... so, i would assume that is the situation here.
I'm the kind of parent who is over the top protective. Admittedly. Mine do not play out front without supervision and never have. I volunteered every single day at their schools. Yes, every single day. I am the first to look down my nose at what I perceive to be bad parenting.
That being said, I've also been witness to media coverage after a murder and seen people interviewed who knew nothing about the victim or what transpired. They were simply in the same school as the victim, but were reported to be "close friends". The things they said were simply not true, but everyone close to the victim was too devastated to be all over tv telling everything they knew. I was appalled to see them come inside bragging about how they were going to be on tv! It really opened my eyes to how the media will grab anyone standing around for their perspective.
According to MM (in the interview last night), she told him she was going to a friend's house. So they knew where she was going. Should they have watched her get there? Should they have confirmed that she made it there and expected a phone call from said neighbor saying she was on her way home? I certainly would have, but again, I'm considered a "helicopter" parent by many.
As a parent, we can't win. We are either smothering them or neglectful with no in-between for most on the outside looking in.
I still see no reason that it cannot be stated what the last time was that she was seen.
If someone is confessing, there are plenty of other details that LE knows that they can ask the confessor in order to eliminate him or her.
The public has given lots of help in the past. The Unabomber was solved by the brother, for instance. Somer Thompson by former roommates of the perp. Mothers turned in their own children.
Anyway, here is the uncut version of MM speaking
http://www.wfaa.com/home/related/fu...rl-house-gallagher-polyamorous-214914931.html
Man! That poor guy was one uncomfortable looking human being.
Man! That poor guy was one uncomfortable looking human being.
He looks like he is completely devastated but was too polite to walk away from the reporters or not answer them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.