everybodhi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
- Messages
- 4,474
- Reaction score
- 21,545
From my previous link, "they didn't find many tire marks", is a weird thing for investigators to say but I chalk it up to lousy reporting.I don't think we are necessarily disagreeing. Maybe so or maybe I'm not being clear so let me try again, just in case. My point is that I don't believe she went into the river from either FM 359 or FM 723. I suspect (without evidence) that she was in the park for some reason and went into the river there. In the news video linked below you can see an area where this could have easily happened at about 44 seconds, when the camera pans away from the reporter. No fence, no trees, a person could drive a car right into the river. There are even tire tracks (perhaps from a recovery vehicle).
So that is my answer to your question. How did it [the car] get there? Rather than floating over a fence it got there because she was already inside the park with easy access to the river.
FBCSO: Missing woman's SUV possibly found in water near Richmond | khou.com
Sure the water the was high and sure the car floated down the river once it was in. No argument. And since some people are using the word conspiracy I'll also say that I'm not alleging any conspiracy or wrongdoing.
In summary, I suspect Allison was in the park when she went into the river and I don't know why she would have been in the park. That is all.
IMO
I mean, how many tire tracks are not many, exactly?
And "where they believe the vehicle left the road" implies your guess is as good as theirs. Just sayin'.
"According to investigators, they don't believe foul play was involved in the woman's death. They also said they didn't find many tire marks where they believe the vehicle left the road and entered the water. They said the vehicle floated about 100 yards down the creek from where it entered and the air in the tires may have allowed it to do that."
Last edited: