I had a number of screaming moments while watching the testimony of Beth. I work with young adults with a wide range of disabilities, including ED and Autism.
Most illuminating of the whole testimony was her cavalier and informal interactions at the DEATH PENALTY phase of a trial. Making small talk about the people questioning her and chuckling when the family of the murdered child sits in the courtroom tells me all I need to know about her.
Her testimony about this killer is based on months of work 20 some odd years ago. Nothing she said could be extrapolated to him and his decision-making on the days surrounding the murder. He was never been determined to be unable to make decisions for himself (no one had guardianship of him, no SSDI as far as we know). He has/had a drivers license.
He was able to understand the cause and effect of having cameras on his van-- he knew to cover them up in order to do what he wished in the van on any given day. His interactions with Athena show he knew his actions were wrong---- he took her surreptitiously, he told her to stop whining and crying (not confused why she was scared or protesting), and as she was dying he sang songs to drown out her cries/whimpers. On the previous day, he was crafty enough to test whether adults were home.
There is no excuse. He is a person who may have had gaps in his development but he is responsible for his action. It is notable that the defense team did not tell Beth that he did not hit her AND that there is evidence of a brutal murder and rape.
Ughhhhh.