It sure should, SS!
I am not caught up in reading, so I am super-sorry if someone else has already addressed this in this way...
I'm not sure many journalists consider the connotative use of some of the words they use and sentences they create-- at least not to the level that could withstand our WS magnifying glass!
Because we can't automatically trust that author's intentions are consistent with his or her word choice, I find myself trying to gauge the validity/trustworthiness (trust-word-iness?) through other elements of an author's writing.
As y'all pointed out, there were a few key names containing errors. If concrete, verifiable words had issues, it makes me cautious about the more discretionary "free-choice" words used to construct the rest of the article. I'm just not sure how much stock we can place in the overall veracity of the piece.
I got an odd vibe from this article. I'm eager to catch up on these next six pages to see if anyone else did, too.