GUILTY TX - Christina Morris, 23, Plano, 30 August 2014 - #21 *Arrest*

[SaintGirl]

I understand. Probably was unsettling. Christina missing 3 months and his lies are unsettling to all of us as well. He has a huge scrapbook he showed in interviews so he can share the so called threats with LE and his attorney and they can deal with that. Not concerned about that cause we didn't do that. We just want to find Christina. Picketing has been over for a while. Can we move on? Let's talk about his injuries and his bite mark. That can help us find her I think. Where do u think he got those. And can you tell me your theory on what you think happened? You may have shared that with all of the other requests. Been out all day and haven't seen it.

If he didn't have those injuries Friday night but showed up to work with them Saturday morning at work, then I would have to assume they are tied to Christina's disappearance. Plus going on Anna's and Jonni's interview yesterday, both said they think she fought like a cat. So JMOM from what you know about his injuries, do you think they occurred in the car, out of the car or both?

 

[SaintGirl]

Fair enough. It seemed that you were insinuating that the family picketing has caused the case to stall with your previous comment, so I'm surprised that you would picket the whole group.

Great point, catpatrol. Great point!

 

[MIKAYOYO]

I understand. Probably was unsettling. Christina missing 3 months and his lies are unsettling to all of us as well. He has a huge scrapbook he showed in interviews so he can share the so called threats with LE and his attorney and they can deal with that. Not concerned about that cause we didn't do that. We just want to find Christina. Picketing has been over for a while. Can we move on? Let's talk about his injuries and his bite mark. That can help us find her I think. Where do u think he got those. And can you tell me your theory on what you think happened? You may have shared that with all of the other requests. Been out all day and haven't seen it.

Even though I'm not Frisson, I would love tto give my 2 centts.

Even though y'all ceased the picketing, I can guaranttee there are hangers on, unstable people and even stable people, who latch on to this stuff and continue tthe harrassment. Based on previous cases I've followed, you can never move on from that. The idea has been planted.

I honestly would love to discuss the injuries and bitemarks. I'm floored that with video of where Christina parked with EA's car nearby, plus the bitemarks/bruises, car damage, turned off phone, etc.. that he has not been arrested or at least named a suspect. I want to talk about why that is. Whatt is LE waiting for?

My theory is she left with him willingly. I think LE knows this but have notthing beyond that (no evidence of crime committted). He eitther dropped her off at the party apartment or got her out of his car somehow and killed her and managed to hide her so well no one can seem o find her but he's so dumb he's giving off red flags in everytthing he doues.

 

[MIKAYOYO]

Fair enough. It seemed that you were insinuating that the family picketing has caused the case to stall with your previous comment, so I'm surprised that you would picket the whole group.

H;mmm, I don't understand. If I felt a bunch of people were involved or at least knew what happened, I would put the whole group on blast. I'd especially go for tthe weakest link, IN ADDITION to the lastt to see her. I've followed enough cases here to know it's not always the last to see the vic that's guilty. Not enough to put all my eggs in that basket.

 

[zippixx]

*Sigh* I see we're no further than we were last time I checked in.

Regarding the dog's hit in the garage.... If LE saw Christina's car pull in and park, there would be footage of an assualt there that would cause said hit, right? Someone mentioned EA dropping her back to the apartment. That's something I thought early on. If she lost her keys and didn't realize until they were getting close to the car (apartment said to be 20 min walking distance) then he could have offered to drop her back at the apartment. IMO, LE has video they aren't sharing. It's been said in media or warrant that LE saw her pull in and park. It's also been said EA's car was pretty close by. Those things make me believe they saw something on camera (LE) or saw nothing. Either she gott into his car willingly or something else happened. But if LE saw on tape her gettting intto his car, why did they need tthe seatbelt from his car? Blood? I don't tthink itt's far fetched that he dropped her back at tthe apartment and something happened tthere, and maybe THAT is why LE has nott made an arrestt or officially named him POI.

Sorry for the multiple 'T' my keyboard is jacked.

Good point.. I'm also curious why they would need the seat belt, if the video were to show her getting in the car. Could it be that the video is too grainy or dark to make a positive ID? It doesn't make much sense that you would strap a "victim" into the front seat.. You would most likely use the trunk.. Soooo, why did they take the seat belt? I'm thinking that maybe the video doesn't show squat..

 

[Mamamerced]

I don't think anyone can say what they'd do if tthey were in the situation unless they were in the situation. I can say if there were a group of people and none of tthem would talk to me, I'd put tthem all on blast, not justt the last to see them.

I may be misreading your post, but, if by group of people, you mean Christina's supporters.....they did try to talk with EA and family, but that family refused all communication.
If I've misinterpreted your post, I apologize.

 

[deeisnuts]

Good point.. I'm also curious why they would need the seat belt, if the video were to show her getting in the car. Could it be that the video is too grainy or dark to make a positive ID? It doesn't make much sense that you would strap a "victim" into the front seat.. You would most likely use the trunk.. Soooo, why did they take the seat belt? I'm thinking that maybe the video doesn't show squat..

I figured it was because luminol showed blood traces so they had to keep the seat belt for testing. I can't think of another scenario of why they would keep the seat belt.

 

[MIKAYOYO]

I may be misreading your post, but, if by group of people, you mean Christina's supporters.....they did try to talk with EA and family, but that family refused all communication.
If I've misinterpreted your post, I apologize.

I mean all the peopole tthat were in atendance that night. Not tthe supporters.

 

[SaintGirl]

I figured it was because luminol showed blood traces so they had to keep the seat belt for testing. I can't think of another scenario of why they would keep the seat belt.

I would assume so, too. Same with the mats.

 

[zippixx]

I figured it was because luminol showed blood traces so they had to keep the seat belt for testing. I can't think of another scenario of why they would keep the seat belt.

Yeah, good point. It just seems strange to me that there would be stuff on the seat belt... UNLESS the fight WAS inside the car... I would have to bet that they have some items from the trunk also...

 

[MIKAYOYO]

I figured it was because luminol showed blood traces so they had to keep the seat belt for testing. I can't think of another scenario of why they would keep the seat belt.

I don't mean to be graphic, I'm a clinical type of person, but if luminol was used and only traces of blood was found, it's not likely tto only be found on the seatbelt. If EA killed her inside the car, he strangled her and blood wouldn't be found.

ETA: MOOOOOO

 

[Mamamerced]

H;mmm, I don't understand. If I felt a bunch of people were involved or at least knew what happened, I would put the whole group on blast. I'd especially go for tthe weakest link, IN ADDITION to the lastt to see her. I've followed enough cases here to know it's not always the last to see the vic that's guilty. Not enough to put all my eggs in that basket.

Which is the group you're referring to, the party goers or the picketers? I'm not following this well.

 

[MIKAYOYO]

Which is the group you're referring to, the party goers or the picketers? I'm not following this well.

The partygoers. I do not blame the family in the least. I cannot say what I would do if my child was missing. However, based on whatt i"ve seen in the pastt on this board, I would tread litely on who I thought did it. Again, I would hope tto trustt LE to do their job and keep me posted. I've just seen too much to inerefere with an investigattionl. There's been too much that a defense attourney could use to create a reasonable doubt should itt go to trial. MOO

 

[MIKAYOYO]

Holy crap. Please forgive my typing and extra letters.

 

[zippixx]

H;mmm, I don't understand. If I felt a bunch of people were involved or at least knew what happened, I would put the whole group on blast. I'd especially go for tthe weakest link, IN ADDITION to the lastt to see her. I've followed enough cases here to know it's not always the last to see the vic that's guilty. Not enough to put all my eggs in that basket.

If EA is indeed just an "accessory" & not really a part of the actual abduction, it seems that it would be in his best interest to at least be truthful (if that is even possible) about his injuries.. I sincerely don't think he can be truthful, because I believe he IS directly responsible & he has a Death Penalty attorney to prove it.. JMO!

 

[zippixx]

Holy crap. Please forgive my typing and extra letters.

Yeah, it is rather annoying...LOL.. (just kidding with ya)

 

[frisson]

All topics would include injuries and bite marks.

I agree ....as well as other issues not limited to bites and injuries

 

[deeisnuts]

I don't mean to be graphic, I'm a clinical type of person, but if luminol was used and only traces of blood was found, it's not likely tto only be found on the seatbelt. If EA killed her inside the car, he strangled her and blood wouldn't be found.

ETA: MOOOOOO

She could have been injured.

 

[MIKAYOYO]

Yeah, it is rather annoying...LOL.. (just kidding with ya)

OMG. Stop! lol I don't have ttime for backspace.

IMI If EA is guilty, he didn'tt do it alone (meaning didn't cover it up alone). It wasn't pre-meditated (IMO)

 

[catpatrol]

H;mmm, I don't understand. If I felt a bunch of people were involved or at least knew what happened, I would put the whole group on blast. I'd especially go for tthe weakest link, IN ADDITION to the lastt to see her. I've followed enough cases here to know it's not always the last to see the vic that's guilty. Not enough to put all my eggs in that basket.

I'm not disagreeing, I would be blasting all of them too. But, IMO, they are going for the weakest link. All the probable cause for the warrant? I think the family knew of 95% of that information when they picketed, and the web of lies EA was already caught in made him the weakest link. Even if he is not the ultimately guilty party, I think he has information.