A ha-a blood test will also reveal herpes anti-bodies within three months of exposure. I am trying to find out whether or not there is a DNA fingerprint to herpes so you can tell who spread it to who....quite frankly it is making my headache however!!!
Here is the answer I suspect-but this is not layman speak so I do not understand it completely...
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=347823
Anyone up to translating???
believe - I'm no expert, but here is what I found that seems to apply:
BBM
" the use of six endonucleases, EcoRI, BglII, HindIII, KpnI, BamHI, and SstI, established that
each patient was infected by a unique virus."
and
"The results suggest that
each individual may induce specific variation in the herpes simplex virus type 2 genome and that the results of epidemiological studies based on restriction endonuclease analyses of herpes simplex virus type 2 DNA must be interpreted with care."
and
"Considerable variability among isolates from different patients was detected, although with
the first four endonucleases (EcoRI, BglII, HindlIl, and KpnI) certain DNA restriction patterns
appeared to predominate, whereas with six endonucleases,
an individual virus strain could
be assigned to each patient. Some variability was also observed between virus isolates from
the same patient."
and
"
Analysis of the cleavage patterns of HSV DNA from 30 patients with clearly defined clinical
histories (16) by using the endonucleases EcoRI, BglII, HindII, and KpnI confirmed the
immunological typing of the genital HSV2 isolates. Also, it was possible to map any nucleotide
base sequence variations between isolates by reference to the published cleavage maps for
these endonucleases (5, 14)."
and
"Comparison of BamHI and SstI digestion patterns from different patients indicated that
only
two patients (A and W) possessed identical (prototype) viruses. On extension of the rank-
VOL. 38, 1982ings of HSV2 isolates in Table 1 for four endonucleases to six endonucleases it was apparent that all
30 patients possessed their own unique virus
(data not shown) since patients A and W differed in their KpnI digestion pattern.
It is therefore
possible to define an individual virus by cleavage of the DNA with six restriction endonucleases.
However, since it is difficult to unambiguously identify the various fragments in BamHI
or SstI digests or the source of the variation (i.e., addition or deletion of restriction sites,
addition or deletion of short sequences) we define the individual strains by the DNA cleavage
patterns with EcoRI, BglII, HindIII, and KpnI. Reisolations of HSV2 on subsequent visits to
the clinic by each of the 30 patients permitted the study of HSV variation in vivo. The results
of these studies are shown in Table 2 for endonucleases BamHI and SstI. The results with
EcoRI, BgIII, HindIII, and KpnI indicated that in 29 of 30 patients no difference was apparent
between isolates from the same patient, whereas with patient V both the HindIII and EcoRI
digestion patterns varied. This implied that patient V had been reinfected with a completely
new strain of HSV2 subsequent to his first infection."
**************************************************************
Seems to me like they could nail him with his pee-pee.....