Shoot to kill.
Without being attacked.
Also, why she didn't know she was in a totally different apartment (wasn't it even on a different floor?) could be a big part of recklessness.
Last edited:
Shoot to kill.
Oh sorry. I did not realize there were eye witnesses...What do you mean "please!!!". That's exactly what she did.
The grandpa wasn't a professional trained in cruise ship windows. That's the difference.
She shot him. She is the eye witness. I really don't understand what you are confused about:Oh sorry. I did not realize there were eye witnesses...
When she entered the apartment she thought she was in her apartment. She thoughtj he was an intruder. She told him to show his hands..he didn't. So she protected herself. I would have done the same. And I don't live on the Southside of Dallas.
Exactly. With all of the differences in their apartments (furniture etc) why did she not recognize immediately she was not in the correct apartment. Instead she focused on Mr. Jean.Without being attacked.
Also, why she didn't know she was in a totally different apartment (wasn't or even on a different floor?) could be a big part of recklessness.
I'm not confused. At all!She shot him. She is the eye witness. I really don't understand what you are confused about:
"I’m an off duty officer. I thought I was in my apartment and I shot a guy"
Great. So you agree then there is an eye-witness.I'm not confused. At all!
I will agree that I don't know if there was an eye witness. It's not out of the realm of possibility....but it has not been reported. You know damn well I was being sarcastic and you missed my point completely. Every opinion here is based on supposition and not fact. That's all I'm saying!Great. So you agree then there is an eye-witness.
Let's pretend Amber was in her own apartment; would she have been justified in shooting the intruder?Right. And even if a she thought it was her apartment, it's okay to just execute someone you find in there whomis not attacking you inn any way? What if he had been the one mistaken about the apartment? IS the penalty for that death?
Of course, if she reasonably believed the force was immediately necessary to protect her against the Jean's use or attempted use of unlawful force.Let's pretend Amber was in her own apartment; would she have been justified in shooting the intruder?
Whoa! You're making a number of unfounded assumptions. "Forcing" her way into apartment? Incorrect. The door was left cracked open (recall, victim had drugs in his system). Getting wasted? No proof. Amber was exhausted from protecting citizens from criminals. Weren't drugs found in the deceased apartment?Yeah it has to do with whether behavior is deemed reckless or not. Depends on the statute and jurisdiction.
Getting wasted (assumption) and forcing your way into another person's apartment who you then shoot to death when he's not even attacking you is all kinds of reckless.
She had a weapon. A dangerous weapon which elevates the duty of care.
The difference could be analogous to someone who mistakes the gas for the break and plows into a group of kids, killing them, as opposed to someone driving drunk and plowing into a group of kids. Or texting and plowing into a group of kids.
One isn't reckless. The other two are.
Um yeah, guess I am not getting your obfuscation. My bad.I will agree that I don't know if there was an eye witness. It's not out of the realm of possibility....but it has not been reported. You know damn well I was being sarcastic and you missed my point completely. Every opinion here is based on supposition and not fact. That's all I'm saying!
She shot him. She is the eye witness. I really don't understand what you are confused about:
"I’m an off duty officer. I thought I was in my apartment and I shot a guy"
Incorrect. Unlawful force is inherent when breaking and entering. Please review Castle Doctrine.Of course, if she reasonably believed the force was immediately necessary to protect her against the Jean's use or attempted use of unlawful force.
Let's role play. Let's say it was Mr. Jean who went into Ms. Guyger's apartment and shot her when she stood up from her couch.Whoa! You're making a number of unfounded assumptions. "Forcing" her way into apartment? Incorrect. The door was left cracked open (recall, victim had drugs in his system). Getting wasted? No proof. Amber was exhausted from protecting citizens from criminals. Weren't drugs found in the deceased apartment?
Yes. And she was on a totally different floor. Anyone sober should know what floor they're on and that they don't have a red mat in front of their door like the victim did.
On the anniversary of Botham Jean’s death, jury selection in his murder trial begins
Further, there were more witnesses.
Attorneys for Jean's family say two witnesses told them details that contradict Guyger's account.
"They heard knocking down the hallway followed by a woman's voice that they believe to be officer Guyger saying, 'Let me in. Let me in,'" attorney Lee Merritt said.
The family's attorneys say one of the witnesses then heard gunshots followed by a man's voice.
"What we believe to be the last words of Botham Jean which was 'Oh my god, why did you do that?'" Merritt said.
Witnesses dispute Dallas cop's account in fatal shooting of neighbor, attorney says
Nothing remotely close to "show me your hands!"
Sounds like someone was in a rage because they believed someone was in their place and they went in shooting.
But if this case is moved out of Dallas as the defense wants, in confident she will get off.
In fact, I was quoting the law: PENAL CODE CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITYIncorrect. Unlawful force is inherent when breaking and entering. Please review Castle Doctrine.
Let's pretend Amber was in her own apartment; would she have been justified in shooting the intruder?
Of course, if she reasonably believed the force was immediately necessary to protect her against the Jean's use or attempted use of unlawful force.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.