I have a permit to carry and do it all the time. But, I can honestly say if I came home and found someone in my house, I would not automatically shoot him. In the state I live in, there's no duty to retreat, but shooting and killing someone would be my last option. If I had to shoot someone, I would, but there would have to be a genuine, clear, imminent threat and no other choice. And I sure as heck would turn on the light to see who I was shooting and if that person had a weapon.
Thank you for this great post. It's pretty hard to get CC permit where I live, although I probably could (teachers are successful getting them). BUT, I don't want one. I am too distractible. Anyway, this was food for thought and we just had a convo about our own views on when to use weapons. If I was coming through my front door (armed or unarmed), and a stranger was in the house, I would retreat. If I did have a weapon on me, or available, I'd surely unholster it and have it available - but I would be across the street, watching to see if anyone came out of the house toward me, and I would be dialing 911.
If, OTOH, I was already inside myself and someone broke down the door, I'd move to the room where we keep our weapons and be prepared to shoot (we recently replaced our wooden framed door with a metal one, due to home invasions in our area, plus we have a camera on the porch and another two in the front yard and driveway, and another one in the side yard...).
The cops who taught me self defense (and my dad) were all about different levels of force. I tend to stay calm in emergencies.
I don't know if there are any laws in Texas (or anywhere) that require a person to assess the threat and match it to the amount of force used to repel it. I used to think that police were supposed to do that, that their training was about that. For me, it would be my own moral and ethical system at play. Neither I nor my husband want to kill anyone, try to avoid any contexts where that would happen, and do not regard our weaponry as something to be used in a situation where it could be avoided. OTOH, I am older and that plays a role. I keep wondering how I'd view this, as a juror.
I believe Ms Guyger needs to be convicted, and I am not buying the "mistake of fact" as the only factor in this case. Anyone who does carry all the time (and someone who has hollow point bullets!) needs to be in a frame of mind to assess threat, not tired or confused. It was not an accidental discharge of any kind, she decided to shoot and she knew her weapon was loaded hollow point. She shot with intent to kill. It was not mere negligence, it was more than that.