I totally agree with you. I missed this discussion before the jury was brought in.
That's the law. It would be inappropriate during the guilt phase but is admissible now.
I totally agree with you. I missed this discussion before the jury was brought in.
LaVendrick SmithVerified account @LaVendrickS 9m9 minutes ago
Posts from Guyger's Pinterest account now being shown to the jury. A post that says "I wear all black to remind you not to mess with me, because I'm already dressed for your funeral."
LaVendrick SmithVerified account @LaVendrickS 9m9 minutes ago
Another post showing someone holding a gun with the caption "stay low, go fast. kill first, die last. one shot, one kill. no luck, all skill."
LaVendrick SmithVerified account @LaVendrickS 10m10 minutes ago
Another post that says "People are so ungrateful. No one ever thanks me for having the patience not to kill them."
That post had one of those minions from Despicable Me in the picture, and Guyger captioned it "Grateful minion."
LaVendrick SmithVerified account @LaVendrickS 8m8 minutes ago
The court is taking a break.
It's inflammatory and unnecessary. JMO
I’m not really sure that these texts and her sexting with a married coworker really prove other than she wasn’t qualified to be in a situation standing judgement over someone with a deadly weapon in her hands.
Her actions show her to be careless and dishonest, and with extremely poor judgement
I want her to get a fair sentence that won’t get overturned.
I’m not really sure that these texts and her sexting with a married coworker really prove other than she’s not a very moral or quality person to be a law enforcement officer and not anyone to promote.
Her actions show her to be careless and dishonest.
I want her to get a fair sentence that won’t get overturned.
LaVendrick SmithVerified account @LaVendrickS 9m9 minutes ago
"I wear all black to remind you not to mess with me, because I'm already dressed for your funeral."
"stay low, go fast. kill first, die last. one shot, one kill. no luck, all skill."
Those texts should not have been brought into evidence.
Those texts should not have been brought into evidence.
They should. Evidence of character is admissible during the sentencing phase.
These texts are snapshots in time, some were said in jest, we don't see the entire context of any of them or what she faced that particular day...etc. It's only there for shock value and to inflame opinions. It is not in my opinion equal to what a judicial proceeding should include. If I were a juror and had to be subjected to that I'd dismiss it.
It's inflammatory and unnecessary. JMO
These texts are snapshots in time, some were said in jest, we don't see the entire context of any of them or what she faced that particular day...etc. It's only there for shock value and to inflame opinions. It is not in my opinion equal to what a judicial proceeding should include. If I were a juror and had to be subjected to that I'd dismiss it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.