I don't see that said in this video what you are quoting. "Lt. Brad Herried, the Austin Police Detective in overall charge of the case, stated that Houston police had been "watching the house" since earlier in the week. On a routine drive-by of the watch a Houston police officer spotted an individual of interest OUTSIDE the residence in daylight hours and initiated a legal detainment. "
Queue up to 2 minutes 20 seconds...
I hear "as the week progressed, this current week, a lead was generated that created a location of interest in the Houston area in Harris County. Federal, State and local resources deployed to that area of Harris county and began to investigate a residence there. Ultimately those investigators encountered an individual outside of that residence who was detained on Thursday, December 19th 2019. As the evening progressed a search warrant was issued for property....."
I differ in my conclusion from you that they stated there was a routine drive by of the watch.
I disagree that they stated they had been watching the house since earlier in the week. Investigation of the house could merely be what we have been doing here. e.g. who owns it, who lives there etc.
Although.... I will say, I don't disbelieve that is what happened, if that makes sense. I think we all are still racking our brains as to what was the lead, when they monitored the house at the outset, and did indeed the MF not go home straight after the abduction, but instead went somewhere else prior to going home days after on Thursday. If they were indeed monitoring the house live, why the need to ask the neighbors if the other vehicle was there the night before driving through (or were they asking that as to the night of the abduction?)