• #41
  • #42
Them almost exclusively having insufficient DNA just screams "medical" or "archeological" to me.
Namus lists all 5 of them as partial remains with soft tissues. Would that rule both of those theories out?
 
  • #43
Namus lists all 5 of them as partial remains with soft tissues. Would that rule both of those theories out?

I am afraid it wont rule them out.

Medical specimens can have preserved and prepped muscles, ligments and other tissues on them.

Archeological remains are sometimes mummified.
 
  • #44
Bump!
 
  • #45
  • #46
I wonder if these bones have been interned or if they are still being kept somewhere. Seems that by our scientific standards today we could test and learn quite a bit more about this case than we could in 1986

I know this is a post from 7 years ago, but these individuals are buried under this concrete marker in Plot "I I 45" at Harris County Cemetery #2.


1760902785472.webp
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
82
Guests online
2,607
Total visitors
2,689

Forum statistics

Threads
645,720
Messages
18,847,149
Members
245,777
Latest member
Common Sense Prevails
Top