- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 16,167
- Reaction score
- 57,782
Understandable, but still against the law.
But it could possibly be ruled a crime of passion or a temporary insanity.
Much different that what you keep insisting he did.
Understandable, but still against the law.
You are using your logical thinking skills. Something this Dad probably didn't have the capability of at the time.
But it could possibly be ruled a crime of passion or a temporary insanity.
Much different that what you keep insisting he did.
But what if it turned out the driver had not been drunk? Was having a medical emergency or a stroke or seizure?
You act like he drove across town and returned to the scene.
He was right by the house. He walked in to get it and right back out and shot the drunk driver within moments.
So they can't find the gun.. Where can it be..
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Free-David-Barajas/455719021202726
One of the comments really makes me think.
BBM
Second degree murder if convicted by a judge or jury under the letter of the law.
Manslaughter in a plea bargain or if convicted by a jury inclined not to hold him to the letter of the law and if the defense raises the issue of recklessness sufficiently for the judge to include manslaughter in the instructions to the jury.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.19.htm
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/SOTWDocs/PE/htm/PE.8.htm
Barring any unknowns as to the father's mental health, an insanity defense won't fly.
A family member of mine was killed by a drunk driver; I was with them when they died.
It never occurred to me to kill the driver in retaliation. Not once. Not ever.
Tests showed Banda's blood alcohol was twice the legal limit when his Chevrolet Malibu rear-ended the Barajas' family's Ford 250 truck that had run out of gas on an unlit county road near Alvin, investigators said. The inebriated driver failed to swerve or even apply his brakes before plowing into the truck and crushing Barajas' sons, David Jr., 12, and Caleb, 11.
A Brazoria County grand jury reviewed the evidence and heard testimony from Barajas before indicting him Friday for murder.
"His testimony is sealed and no statement about it can be released at this time," said Sanders.
Shortly after the accident, Barajas told relatives that he could not recall anything beyond rushing to the aid of his sons.
Well, he was thinking logically enough to get rid of the gun.
What do I keep insisting he did?? Besides kill him in cold blood, which is what he did.
He had time enough to walk home, find his gun and walk back, and think about what he was going to do.
But if this was a knee jerk reaction...a crime of passion, he would have grabbed the nearest weapon to him, and attacked the guy, not stopped and thought to himself, "Yeah....the gun. I'll go get my gun."