- Joined
- Jun 9, 2016
- Messages
- 42,099
- Reaction score
- 214,303
The letter of recommendation also states Lori graduated from High School but then she took the GED in 1990 and stated to the testing board she only completed 11th grade. It's all lies, IMO.
The letter of recommendation also states Lori graduated from High School but then she took the GED in 1990 and stated to the testing board she only completed 11th grade. It's all lies, IMO.
I read "from highschool" with no mention of graduation? I agree this lovely letter is a fabrication with poor grammar on letterhead....
The next line says "After graduation..." implying Lori graduated.
WHOOPS! The non-standard grammar stands out to me; once again you're right.
How did she get the sheet of letterhead? Another tiny piece of the puzzle.
Well, if Velling will just invite us up for a low-key sleuther's weekend, with Federal investigator access, we'd wrap this up!
We could tell more by holding the page. It would be terrific if folks would scan & post images of actual stationary from that hotel.
Does the hotel still operate, even as part of a chain?
:seeya:
Well, if Velling will just invite us up for a low-key sleuther's weekend, with Federal investigator access, we'd wrap this up!
We could tell more by holding the page. It would be terrific if folks would scan & post images of actual stationary from that hotel.
Does the hotel still operate, even as part of a chain?
:seeya:
Those who have been following this thread will remember discussion about a 1988 NV marriage record for a BST and RWB. I've been working on finding out if that BST could be FLEK for quite a while.
EmiLove832 has been searching as well and with the info I found she was able to find additional court records for BST and RWB (including their divorce). EmiLove was also able to find BST from that marriage record alive and on social media.
We are now certain that the BST in the 1988 NV record can NOT be FLEK. We're bummed at the loss of a lead but now this record can be ruled out as being associated with the case. Hope this helps for anyone else who was still trying to track down that BST.
I wonder if the hotel could identify whether that letterhead was even their pattern from 1988? She could have taken the stationery from someone she knew who stayed there or she could have found the header graphic on something at the library and photocopied it onto her own paper. I lean towards the latter. Notice how the top portion of the paper above the body of the letter has less shading than the bottom. That could happen if she copied two pieces of paper together. I also imagine the real hotel paper would be color but her letter is black and white. I think she found the top design in a magazine or news article about the hotel from 1988 and made her own stationery for the fake letter.
Yes it's still there - part of the Mandarin chain now so uses the Mandarin logo http://www.mandarinoriental.com/bangkok/ I would say the logo she used was legit - the anniversary dates match up with the year the hotel opened according to their current website.
I would normally think that as well, but like I said...I've seen that EXACT letter (grammar and punctuation mistakes and all). My run away friend had a copy of it~~showed it to me when I finally got back in touch with her years later and we talked about her running away. We had talked about the mistakes in the letter and she said no one really pays attention to that anyway in the jobs she was working. IE: waitress jobs, etc. My friend would have used it between 1983-1986, so I'm guessing it was around for awhile before FLEK starting using it.
I think it may have been a copy from their stationery but not necessarily their actual stationery paper. With so many famous people having stayed there I wonder if there is a book somewhere with a letter from a famous person written on Oriental Hotel stationary. She could have just copied the top portion of the letter for the letterhead and added her fake reference letter to the bottom. Just an idea. Others have suggested she knew someone who went to Thailand and "borrowed" their paper to make her letter. That's possible as well I suppose but less likely, IMO. The typed letter was printed from a computer. The font and typed lines are too smooth and uniform distances to have been done with a typewriter. And speaking of printing letters, In 1988, who had printers you could just put in lose paper and print? Not very many places did, IIRC. A few businesses might have had fancy laser printers but not many. Most libraries had the old style dot-matrix printer paper like this: https://recollectionsofplay.wordpress.com/2014/12/17/totally-80s-dot-matrix-printer-paper/ HP had a deskjet that printed individual sheets of paper but it cost $1000 in 1988: http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/abouthp/hi...rinting/0019/index.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN I doubt she could have accessed that type of printer unless she was employed someplace that had one.
To get a paper like the reference letter she would have to print it then photo copy it onto the hotel letterhead, IMO. I wonder if any analysis of the ink was done to find out what kind of printer and what year it was printed? Probably not something in the budget of this case. It would be interesting to know when she concocted the Thailand letter of reference and who she showed the letter to to get a job or place to live.
i am bumping this up due to the discussion of the letter of reference. It sounds like the letter might have made the rounds somehow. That the letter had been seen before is the only thing I have read to date that makes me consider the idea that an identity broker might have been involved.
I think it may have been a copy from their stationery but not necessarily their actual stationery paper. With so many famous people having stayed there I wonder if there is a book somewhere with a letter from a famous person written on Oriental Hotel stationary. She could have just copied the top portion of the letter for the letterhead and added her fake reference letter to the bottom. Just an idea. Others have suggested she knew someone who went to Thailand and "borrowed" their paper to make her letter. That's possible as well I suppose but less likely, IMO. The typed letter was printed from a computer. The font and typed lines are too smooth and uniform distances to have been done with a typewriter. And speaking of printing letters, In 1988, who had printers you could just put in lose paper and print? Not very many places did, IIRC. A few businesses might have had fancy laser printers but not many.
To get a paper like the reference letter she would have to print it then photo copy it onto the hotel letterhead, IMO. I wonder if any analysis of the ink was done to find out what kind of printer and what year it was printed? Probably not something in the budget of this case. It would be interesting to know when she concocted the Thailand letter of reference and who she showed the letter to to get a job or place to live.
Re: The Reference Letter
I think the entire reference letter is just strange. Maybe some of you who were familiar with all of the 'how to change your identity' instructions in the 80s can chime in on this one, but why would she pick a famous hotel in Thailand to be her false letter of reference? I know it was mentioned in prior threads that this would be a tough reference to check bc of the ~12 hr time difference. Was this a piece of advice given out by these 'identity' books, or was FLEK intelligent enough to think of that concept herself?
I may be wrong, but I just feel like if I was creating a fake reference, a hotel in Thailand wouldn't even be on my radar. Maybe The Oriental is more well-known than I think, or was at the time, but it just seems like a really odd concept to me. Even if employers in the types of jobs she may have been applying for (waitress, dancer, etc.) wouldn't actually 'check' the reference, I feel like if someone applied for a job and claimed to have lived in Thailand for the past several years, it could at least elicit some questions from a boss/coworker, and then how on earth would you answer them? It just seems so over-the-top fake that I can't believe someone would actually try it.
I wonder if the hotel could identify whether that letterhead was even their pattern from 1988? She could have taken the stationery from someone she knew who stayed there or she could have found the header graphic on something at the library and photocopied it onto her own paper. I lean towards the latter. Notice how the top portion of the paper above the body of the letter has less shading than the bottom. That could happen if she copied two pieces of paper together. I also imagine the real hotel paper would be color but her letter is black and white. I think she found the top design in a magazine or news article about the hotel from 1988 and made her own stationery for the fake letter.
Hi Guys~~popping in to say HELLO!!! :greetings:
It was easily photocopied. That's what my run-away friend had. Then you trace over the signature really carefully. I asked her the same question way back when.