Dude! Your life is seriously more exciting than mine!
I was told decades ago that one should always step out of the car when stopped, so that the officer(s) can see one isn't armed. So the next time I was stopped (expired registration sticker on a borrowed car), I turned off the ignition and got out as the officers approached. I ended up facing a female officer almost a foot shorter than I. (I'm 6'3".) And I SAW the flash of fear in her eyes, even though she recovered immediately as I stepped back from her with my open hands clearly visible.
I got to take a drunk test for my stupidity (I wasn't drunk), but even so, I wasn't abused or disrespected. I did learn a lesson about getting out of the car when stopped.
So, yeah, I have to wonder why the cop in question wanted Ms. Bland out of that car...
Was it me???? LOL, I just smiled reading your post, as I can just picture that in my mind.
Sometimes a LEO has a personal preference, and some it just depends on the actual and individualized situation/surroundings...and combination of preference for that type of surrounding.
I do not know if that specific agency had a set policy on officer safety on traffic stops by the side of the road. There are ALWAYS discussions of "experts" as to which is safer - driver side approach or passenger side approach. Different academies teach different approaches...many times why? Personal preferences of the instructors.
My "preference" has always been passenger side. Does that mean I always used it? No, as it could change due to the shoulder (rocks, too narrow, weeds, etc.).
ETA: Duh, I forgot to respond to your question about why he wanted her out of the car. So sorry. It could be a similar situation - at that point, after what has transpired, his preference was to have her out of the car. For whatever reason, he maybe felt safer. Many people question that, but until one really puts themselves in that situation, it's hard to understand. I'm not sticking up for him, please understand. Just trying to voice the experience that in that given situation, that is going downhill, he wanted her out of the car, out of concern for the reaction he was getting from her. He's entitled to ask her. I'm already anticipating some here will disagree with that, and think I'm finding "safety" as his excuse. No...I'm saying that at the time, he may have been asking himself why he's getting such the reaction from her, and doesn't know and would feel better pulling her out (bad choice of my words in this point!). There's a reason why traffic stops are hazardous, and it's because there is much unknown of the person and their items in their vehicle.
And Nova, thank you for not being disrespectful to LEO's. I teach my own kids that. Just as they need to be respectful to all adults. It doesn't normally hurt the situation, and sometimes it does help.
P.S. For other posters asking about "middle of the road" - I don't get hung up on the fact that he wasn't in the actual center/middle of the road, it's a general term to state he was in the road. I don't see that use of his description as a fabrication at all. Now, his part about trying to de-escalate the situation? Ummm, no. Disagree with that
