- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,235
- Reaction score
- 274,048
Sooooo...the pictures of what he did to that precious baby, photographic images of his actions, were prejudicial & shouldn't have been shown to the jury???
Um, gee, that sounds like evidence to me, and aren't all juries presented with evidence???
I'm not a lawyer, or a nurse answering a pediatric helpline, but I don't see a problem with those pictures.
"Our" Sherin, with the other injured party:
View attachment 193969
JMHO YMMV
So according to this stellar father, it is unfair for the jury to see evidence of what he did to his daughter? Doesn't seem like a valid argument, imo.