- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 2,186
- Reaction score
- 207
I've heard it called a "whiners clause" - anyone who makes a stink and sues is automatically removed from the will and their share divided up amongst everyone else.
I read the article and it is a shame such a fight broke out at that time. There was probably a lot of underlying anger and the jewelry was just the straw that broke the camel's back.
I am kind of miffed though at the newspaper to allow the writer to characterize the fight as a 'cat fight'. It was a fight between two people who happen to be women. It trivializes and is just plain sexist to label a fight between women as 'cat fights'.
I've heard it called a "whiners clause" - anyone who makes a stink and sues is automatically removed from the will and their share divided up amongst everyone else.
One must remember that the "cat fight" usage here comes from Daily Mail, a British tabloid not noted for its sensitivity in matters of sexual politics (understatement). It's indeed a sexist term these days.I am kind of miffed though at the newspaper to allow the writer to characterize the fight as a 'cat fight'. It was a fight between two people who happen to be women. It trivializes and is just plain sexist to label a fight between women as 'cat fights'.