- Joined
- May 18, 2016
- Messages
- 464
- Reaction score
- 4,434
I still think LE knows who did this and they are dotting their i's and crossing their t's before they make an arrest.
Jmo
AGREED
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I still think LE knows who did this and they are dotting their i's and crossing their t's before they make an arrest.
Jmo
She was murdered because:
She would get half the assets otherwise
I found someone I wanted to be with more than you
She knew too much about the illegal drugs being sold in the gym
Someone paid me to do it
She interrupted my burglary in process and I had to kill her
I wanted her life
Her instruction at CG got be seriously injured and I'll never be the same
My husband thinks she's adorable
She was going to out the stuff she was selling because it was a cover
for heroin
I saw her at school and I had to have her.
I tried to get her to notice me but she just wasn't interested
She was against me dating her daughter
How's that for starters?
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
RBBM : Strange. I thought that as soon as I read about this case, about a boyfriend MB didn't like...
This firearm with a serial number is interesting because I have never heard of an officer's weapon being confiscated at the scene of a crime unless the officer actually fired his weapon.
Could one have been confiscated from an officer after autopsy? Was this firearm possibly planted somewhere in the Church that may be part of the ECSD investigations into stolen/missing evidence, specifically firearms?
I tend to believe the firearm was found in the Ford truck since the title and registration
This firearm with a serial number is interesting because I have never heard of an officer's weapon being confiscated at the scene of a crime unless the officer actually fired his weapon. Anybody with LE or criminal law insight ?
This was early on. After exploring leads and following evidence they said they didn't believe it had to do with a love triangle and they were exploring untargeted hit. You cannot refute that.
bbm No it didn't have to do with a love triangle.
bbm I can refute anything I want to, it's my opine it was a targeted murder. jmo
During their investigation, police discovered through search warrants that Missy was dealing with an ongoing financial and marital struggle, and that shed sent flirtatious and familiar messages to someone else.
But after looking into that revelation as a possible motive, the love-triangle thing is not really panning out so far, Johnson says. This means they are exploring the option that the crime was an untargeted type of hit, which greatly opens up the field of suspects.
Jmo
I dont think Missy was killed by anyone she knew. I do think she was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
To me she entered the church while it was being cased or robbed and she was attacked and killed. I do not believe she was targeted.
I do not think it will be solved either.
That scenario was debunked a ling time ago. It is a targetted kill.
Police have seen the entire video from church. They said that she was targeted. Her family believes she was targeted!!!!
I trust they know more than us!! Thanks
FelineGinger!!!
G.M. Cox, an associate professor at Tarleton State University in Fort Worth and a former police chief in Murphy, has followed the case since the outset and says it is likely the break in the case exists with someone that knew Bevers well.
"There has to be some link between her death and people in her past," Cox said. "This person intended to do exactly what they did – when they did it – and whom they did it to.”
http://www.wfaa.com/news/crime/midlothian-pd/337101390
Authorities have not confirmed if the suspect is male or female. But Bevers’ husband, Brandon, believes his wife knew her killer.
http://people.com/crime/missy-bevers-texas-murder-update/
Hi all,
Today, I pushed myself to do some solid thinking and research about the view in opposition to mine: that this was an unplanned murder...that it was a burglary, something of the sort. I have always believed that SP was there to murder Missy. Still do. Firmly.
Part of the entire case, of course, has been speculation re: whether SP is a male or female; my opinion on that issue is also the same as it was 9 months ago -- I have no.freaking.idea. As time wears on, in fact, I become less sure about this variable.
In the midst of this, though, I began thinking about a correlation between these two matters.
I'm curious -
For those who believe that Missy was targeted that morning, when you take a moment and think about the other possibility -- that Missy walked in on a burglary - does that all influence your thoughts about SP being male or female?
For those who lean toward this being an untargeted event, does that scenario come equipped with a male or female SP? Have you equivocated, too?
If you have moved from targeted to untargeted - did your thoughts on gender change?
When I first saw the church video back in April, I assumed it was a male. Just went right to it ....bam. Dude. Then, the speculation began that it could be a female, and like many, I watched the video (many times) through a questioning lens. I have since gone back and forth - examining mannerisms, body, etc.. Of course, I also know about the contents of the SW, the scuttlebutt, etc. After all of that, if the outcome aligns with my belief that Missy was targeted, I will not be completely surprised either way -- though my one hedging point about gender is that very few women could pull off the murder in such a small amount of time (given what is perceived as the weapon used -- a hammer) due to strength, and endurance, particular regarding upper body strength. Having the confidence, too, is another matter. Everyone knows that Missy was in top shape with some serious muscles of her own. Were a woman to kill her, especially given the small window of time allowed, a gun would be a preferable weapon.
Could a woman be a conspirator? Of course, and I do believe that is this case here. But the act itself, I see done by a male. I think the fact that the public - and LE - opened possibility about gender - has given SP a lucky boost.
Strength to strength IMO is the case here: --- Good plans+ executability (given the physicality and mindset of SP) + a couple of red herrings + redirection, and some luck.
Do I think it's solvable? Yes.
Due to LE or tower dumps? Nope.
I call hubris.
http://people.com/crime/murdered-texas-fitness-instructors-family-furious-by-slowed-investigation/
I am just trying to keep the facts straight and the board honest. I didn't say it wasn't targeted. However, the last statement we've had from LE is that after a lot of investigation, they are exploring it as untargeted.
If you would like to refute that, please show me a more recent article with LE saying they believe it is targeted.
I also believe it was an interrupted burglary but I'm not attacking those that believe it was targeted.
This case will never get solved, because the investigators will never admit that they may have been wrong. They have never even considered the other possibilities.