TX - Terri 'Missy' Bevers,45, murdered in church/person in SWAT gear,18 Apr 2016 #12

[SyraKelly]

Alcohol Anonymous? I am so behind....:facepalm:

African American.
Trica said it is not an AA woman

 

[lstiff]

Can you provide some links, pics of the innocent until proven guilty person? It sounds far fetched to me, this innocent woman painting her face, etc

I don't think you can post pictures!!!! -IMO

 

[Michigan]

That's what I'm wondering too

 

[boojudeboo]

I don't understand why someone who was there to kill someone else would wear all that clunky gear, go there with no gun and possibly wear shoes that are too big. All to subdue a very fit target. It seems dicey / would impair killer. Not saying it didn't happen that way but it just seems unecessarily difficult. Curious what others think. (Note I understand gear may have been for protection / disguise but it just seems so cumbersome). All above jmo

I'm guessing protection, and they're worried about leaving behind DNA.

 

[MamaMoonshine]

I don't understand why someone who was there to kill someone else would wear all that clunky gear, go there with no gun and possibly wear shoes that are too big. All to subdue a very fit target. It seems dicey / would impair killer. Not saying it didn't happen that way but it just seems unecessarily difficult. Curious what others think. (Note I understand gear may have been for protection / disguise but it just seems so cumbersome). All above jmo

Guns are traceable. Gloved fists are not. The get up was to make it as hard as possible to identify the perp. This person tried very hard to be unrecognizable. I'm guessing their cell phone is what is going to do them in. Silly criminals and their tech gadgets.

 

[lonetraveler]

I didn't even know that is possible to do? Is that common?

Yes, when you get loan, closer asks if you want to add insurance. My Brother had insurance on his SUV, only made Two payments before he died suddenly. Insurance paid off entire Lian.

These were created by our very own Sparky.

Sent from my HTCD100LVWPP using Tapatalk

 

[Jax49]

I don't understand why someone who was there to kill someone else would wear all that clunky gear, go there with no gun and possibly wear shoes that are too big. All to subdue a very fit target. It seems dicey / would impair killer. Not saying it didn't happen that way but it just seems unecessarily difficult. Curious what others think. (Note I understand gear may have been for protection / disguise but it just seems so cumbersome). All above jmo

Totally agree. Another thing that strikes me is how casual s/he looks moving around the church. They just don't look like someone getting ready to destroy another human being. SMH.

 

[Montjoy]

Folks, let's not rush to judgment here. I see a lot of fingers pointed here, with little real evidence, beyond hunches and hinkey meters. Try to imagine that you're Missy's daughter when you post something, as she could be reading these speculations about her dad, or uncle, or whomever. This isn't just a game of Clue --there are real people affected by every theory you submit.

 

[buddhanna]

Please can someone who is good at cleaning up the still photos post the same full pic with focus from the knees down? There is something about the stance that is bugging me and it looks like the person is putting their weight on their right side which someone with an injured right foot wouldn't do. I tried to stand in this position but it was difficult - then again I'm pigeon toed.

I think it was Sparky. MOO

 

[Michigan]

I understand WHY the disguise it just seems very difficult to commit murder in it. I could barely walk in shoes that are too big and all that gear let alone win a fight in it.

 

[NoMam]

I don't think you can post pictures!!!! -IMO

I see. I didn't know that. I saw someone had done a pretty good photo-analysis of some "suspects" earlier. Maybe that's why the thread was shut down/moved.

 

[cuffem]

I don't understand why someone who was there to kill someone else would wear all that clunky gear, go there with no gun and possibly wear shoes that are too big. All to subdue a very fit target. It seems dicey / would impair killer. Not saying it didn't happen that way but it just seems unecessarily difficult. Curious what others think. (Note I understand gear may have been for protection / disguise but it just seems so cumbersome). All above jmo

I agree that the gear looks uncomfortable and bulky but they had the element of surprise on their side.

 

[Plumeria5]

Guns are traceable. Gloved fists are not. The get up was to make it as hard as possible to identify the perp. This person tried very hard to be unrecognizable. I'm guessing their cell phone is what is going to do them in. Silly criminals and their tech gadgets.

Yes, I agree taking their cell phone was not too smart. They had it turned off but could have wanted it just in case they got an emergency call from home in which they could check their voicemails??

 

[Sparky]

 

[liltexans]

I don't think you can post pictures!!!! -IMO

Correct. The mods have also said several times that we cannot outright accuse someone of murder. Not even by using initials.

 

[MargeGunderson]

Yes, when you get loan, closer asks if you want to add insurance. My Brother had insurance on his SUV, only made Two payments before he died suddenly. Insurance paid off entire Lian.


Sent from my HTCD100LVWPP using Tapatalk

I'm so sorry for the loss of your brother

 

[lstiff]

There was a "rumor" of sorts that Swatperp was an African American female (AA) with a previous broken foot. It has been speculated a white perp could have put on makeup to appear a different skin tone. I think that was a rumor that grew legs.

Per TOS (you can find those on the main page) we can't sleuth people who are not named suspects by LE and never mini children. (Or minor children) um,thanks spellcheck!

I'm off to RL, y'all enjoy the merrygoround till I get back!

IMO

 

[NoMam]

Yes, I agree taking their cell phone was not too smart. They had it turned off but could have wanted it just in case they got an emergency call from home in which they could check their voicemails??

Or Candy Crush, to kill time before killing time.
(oh, that's bad. I feel bad)

 

[liltexans]

Yes, I agree taking their cell phone was not too smart. They had it turned off but could have wanted it just in case they got an emergency call from home in which they could check their voicemails??

We don't yet know if the perp took their cell phone to the murder. LE is hoping that they did. The search warrants were worded to include that possibility.

 

[FelicityLemon]

I don't understand why someone who was there to kill someone else would wear all that clunky gear, go there with no gun and possibly wear shoes that are too big. All to subdue a very fit target. It seems dicey / would impair killer. Not saying it didn't happen that way but it just seems unecessarily difficult. Curious what others think. (Note I understand gear may have been for protection / disguise but it just seems so cumbersome). All above jmo

My view: the costume provided protection - 1) to try and prevent identification if seen or videoed and, 2) most definitely to prevent injury in case she misjudged subduing her victim and she fights back. Hard to explain scratched face and neck and any other injuries that might occur.

I agree that it looks totally cumbersome to be dressed that way, especially for anyone unused to wearing something like that. Even professionals who've trained in riot gear have restricted movement. I do think the clothing was for protection. I do think that clothing was recently seen in pictures that have now been cropped to remove them. The word POLICE is easy enough to add to any piece of clothing. Buy the letters online or at Michaels Arts and Crafts for example.

I suspect (no proof at all) that the killer brought a stun gun with her. It would make sense to do so.

Being so cumbersome, is one reason why I don't believe it to be a simple burglary or vandalism.