TX - Terri 'Missy' Bevers,45, murdered in church/person in SWAT gear,18 Apr 2016 #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #121
When I lived in Midlothian I was out of the city limits so I could burn trash, ....there are still lucky folks around Midlothian who have yet to be annexed and i bet they burn trash. I would think swatperp would burn that costume and fast before the sun came up on the day of the murder. If this is true then the perp lives out of the city limits...

^bbm sbm^ Re ^ line of thought about ppl living outside city limits may legally burn trash, but burning trash within city limits is illegal.
Not sure about ^ conclusion: if perp burned gear logically means perp lives outside city limits.

If a person is mentally & emotionally capable of inflicting multiple penetrating injuries to head & chest causing a woman's death,
doubtful (to me anyway) that such a person would say to self - 'Uh-oh, I can't burn SWAT gear in backyard, because I'd get a $25.00 muni citation.'


OTOH a person considering burning gear could be inhibited by thought - 'Uh-oh, if neighbor sees & reports me, muni code office/LEO will be out here asking me what I'm burning; and when they see the SWAT gear, I'll be headed to Huntsville.' IDK, thinking aloud.
 
  • #122
I helped develop a nearby rural church (same size) a few years ago. And there is no septic. We are waiting for the city to come out to us and have the developers lay the pipe and pumps.

No disrespect..is the church being used? If so where does the raw sewage go? This is a pretty good size church and in use.
 
  • #123
I am not local, but the April 18th Press Conf the Chief MPD stated that crime scene was released around noon. Locals stated that a prayer service or something of that nature was held there on Wed night.

GOOD GRIEF. NO way that crime scene was fully photographed, bagged printed etc, if that is the case. JMO
 
  • #124
This was precision work. And probably a bit of luck (everything falling into place). In a word: Brazen.

That's why I think there was a gun around.

I believe 100% a gun was used. And if that saran wrap object was a silencer, this was a hit.
 
  • #125
I agree. I've watched the folding arms part over and over. I feel like he/she pulls something out and puts it back in the vest or bra?? But it seems to cut away. Maybe checking a phone, and LE cut that part out? And that's why they are checking phone records because they phone is in the videos but they have cut that part out for the public.

Check 1:04 he pulls something out maybe phone, the video slips he doesn't put it up and is then walking.


Also right before he/she starts hammering at the end you can see both shoes slip on and off. Like they are to big. That may have been mentioned but I just noticed.
 
  • #126
  • #127
The cat could jave very easily been parked at the back of the church and not seen, but the part I dont understand is the campers were arriving and someone would have seen a car leave. There is only one way out

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Missy entered at 4:18? If this went down right away, it could have happened in a few minutes. Perp gone before 1st campers arrived. ??????
 
  • #128
no I didn't.. Link :silly: ( really do you have a link )
This event is free admission and sponsored by Lucky U Clothing Boutique. Area businesses are donating food. Sponsors from CG, Chad Tucker Chiropractor, Advocare, and Yoga will be there for demonstrations. Any proceeds goes to a fund set up for MB's girls.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
 
  • #129
..of the perp in the released video. I have a hard time consolidating that very characteristic gait with the possibility of a targeted hit. The UNSUB could not have assumed there were no cameras in the church. He would not know until already inside the church. And yet, he would already be in plain site of a possible camera, before even noticing it. Therefore I think the perpetrator either knew about the cameras, or did not care. In that case, why isn't he worried about his gait? He never heard of gait recognition? My thought is, he knew about the cameras, he possibly knew about gait recognition. And he possibly used the cameras to obscure the investigation. I did an experiment, try it: wrap some weights around your legs, they come with velcro, or place some weight somehow beneath the knees and see how you are walking. If you only place weight on one leg, you got the effect. Just a thought. -Nin
 
  • #130
The cat could have very easily been parked at the back of the church and not seen, but the part I dont understand is the campers were arriving and someone would have seen a car leave. There is only one way out

1 Perp had time to leave before 1st camper arrived. It would have been close, but possible given the time line we have.
2 Perp may have anticipated having scads of time, and planned accordingly, that as it turned out he didn't have. He had no reason to expect one camper would arrive 25 minutes early, in the dark and rain to an exercise class.
3 And we are certainly assuming perp left, of course. But there's always the tiny chance he was the 1st camper who "arrived" at 4:35 and waited in his car, or a "later-arriving" camper (having waited unseen in the far-side parking lot, and then under the cover of dark and rain driving over to where everyone else was to mix in with the arriving group before or as LE arrived).
 
  • #131
The cat could jave very easily been parked at the back of the church and not seen, but the part I dont understand is the campers were arriving and someone would have seen a car leave. There is only one way out

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Campers didnt arrive for a while and then it possible the Suspect left without being seen. It was dark, storming and very easily could have parked on the North side and drove out, no headlights and then not be seen. MB went caught on video at 418. First Camper didnt show up until 435... and it was still a while before the anyone went in as first waited on others. jmho
 
  • #132
Missy entered at 4:18? If this went down right away, it could have happened in a few minutes. Perp gone before 1st campers arrived. ??????

I agree. If the perp saw MB's headlights, he or she could have gotten "into position" to strike immediately.
 
  • #133
The abandoned houses are right in town and we have regular trash service - leave it on the curb, garbage truck picks it up, etc. I don't believe the perp would start a fire at the houses because it would be noticed and called in - IMO.

Yeah... Good point. I was thinking it was a deserted area.
 
  • #134
Yeah... Good point. I was thinking it was a deserted area.

No, it's right off of the highway and really close to several other neighborhoods.
 
  • #135
Does anyone have any idea what is in his/her left hand when he begins hammering at the end. I
 
  • #136
One part that doesn't make sense to me. If SP knew the camera was there why would he/she look right up at it with the visor up. For someone who clearly went through all the effort to be unidentifiable, that seems odd considering SP has to assume that video would be analyzed, enhanced, etc... Why would he/she ever take that risk?
 
  • #137
  • #138
Wasn't there supposed to be an update from LE today?? Does anyone know when it will be??
 
  • #139
Maybe the same person who switched off the outside cameras for him was also supposed to switch off the inside?
 
  • #140
1 Perp had time to leave before 1st camper arrived. It would have been close, but possible given the time line we have.
2 Perp may have anticipated having scads of time, and planned accordingly, that as it turned out he didn't have. He had no reason to expect one camper would arrive 25 minutes early, in the dark and rain to an exercise class.
3 And we are certainly assuming perp left, of course. But there's always the tiny chance he was the 1st camper who "arrived" at 4:35 and waited in his car, or a "later-arriving" camper (having waited unseen in the far-side parking lot, and then under the cover of dark and rain driving over to where everyone else was to mix in with the arriving group before or as LE arrived).

IF that's the case, that 1st camper is the murderer, then either A. LE had to have found the gear discarded nearby and we just don't know about it, or B. LE didn't search the campers' cars and should have.

Even if it was not camper 1 (which is highly likely), it's possible LE has the gear and we don't know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
3,584
Total visitors
3,703

Forum statistics

Threads
632,613
Messages
18,629,033
Members
243,215
Latest member
zagadka
Back
Top