How would they ensure that they didn't end up on camera at the same time?
Good question.
I don't think there were 2 people there but a few things have made me wonder.
How would they ensure that they didn't end up on camera at the same time?
What Bill said would make perfect sense arkansasmimi! Are you still trying to figure out Room 12 or something else?
BTW, I am not sure where the church office is in this building....
Good question.
I don't think there were 2 people there but a few things have made me wonder.
Good question.
I don't think there were 2 people there but a few things have made me wonder.
I downloaded the Midlothian Police Department's Creekside Church Surveillance Video and rendered it in HD at 60 frames per second, showing better quality with enhanced sharpness and color restoration. The suspect wandering the church is much more clearer now.
[video]https://youtu.be/mSWD1TvaGZ4[/video]
I am trying to find a picture, but none of them are exactly right. I am going to try to draw it. Because the teeth are open, one arm is shorter than the other. The suspect thumb where she put the arrow is gripping just one arm, and that arm has red PVC exposed above and below the thumb. The other arm has less PVC, like it broke off, and the tip of that arm is missing PVC. The suspect's tool is strong pair of pliers that locks (because the suspect is only holding one arm and the round brass object stays in place). The arms are parallel, but not the same length. I picked these out of all the ones, but they are not quite right either. The suspect's pair has an extra mechanism element between the arms (spring? lock?) http://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-u7z9k...002006US24k__80967.1440466650.380.500.jpg?c=2 If you open the teeth heads, then the one arm slides down, making one arm shorter than the other. Twelve inches looks correct, the large one.Can you please tell us what kind of tool you think this is? Maybe find a photo online somewhere and then lead us to it because it looks like a box to me.
Could you summarize and/or post direct comparisons? Because I think it's highly, highly, highly unlikely.
while looking at types of this tool on google, i did see quite a few styles that can include wide flat "teeth" that could potentially look like an object being held by the pliers- there are so many types- one for chain locking, several different types for welders- but it DOES appear that something round is held inside the teeth. if this is a locked plier tool and was used at some point, i can imagine the perpetrator continuing on without stopping to disengage the lock - it seems so clear to me that this is what the item IS, that i am having a difficult time seeing the object as anything else- i am trying to be openminded and "see" the box that others see, but i just can't!
Lol omg bifocals...im thinking i need those with this case. Sheesh!! I will never laugh at those "grandma" infomercials that run at night for that huge "as seen on TV" magnifier u can use to read/view with. :websleuther::hilarious:
I agree that it is highly unlikely. I think it was only 1 person.
But I will list the things that have made me question that 2 people were there:
--I see ankle in the gif (thread 2 post 135) I see boots in every other video. Did this person take their boots on and off at the church?
--sometimes the person waddles and sometimes they don't
--it might explain why we sometimes see female mannerisms and sometimes male
--could go towards explaining...something I read on twitter but can't talk about here...I wish a msm would pick that up and do a story on it.
That is all I can think of right now. But like I said, I still think it unlikely 2 evil swat wanna be's were there.
Someone above mentioned that something about the perp reminded them of the way a LE motorcycle cop walks. I seconded that. I scoured youtube to find a couple of videos to illustrate the point. (I'll have to make two posts because of the posting limits.) Check out these videos and just look at the gait of the riders and the way they stand and walk with their toes pointing out. What do you think?
[video=youtube;BeLkrPkjimo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeLkrPkjimo[/video]
Thank you so much! I needed to see this in better detail.
Everyone look at this you tube from Kodiak and make it full screen. Pay attention to the feet at the 1:08 - 1:17 mark and the ankles at the 1:45 mark and tell me you don't see tabs at the heels, pointy toes showing through thin material and ankles - NOT BOOTS. It almost looks as though the sole of one of the bits of footwear is loose and flopping about.
As for the 'tool' I do not see channel lock pliers at all. It is a square ended long rectangular 'box', the shape of a plastic wrap/foil box and there is no way this is a pair of pliers.
i believe there was some RB posting earlier tonight. Some posters seem to find him worthy of looking into. I don't think he is involved so I usually skip those posts.I completely disagree, but I appreciate your open-minded thinking and reasons behind it. Good post. It's possible.
On another note, it seems that there isn't much RB posting. Is it because of the rules here? Or what?
I agree that it is highly unlikely. I think it was only 1 person.
But I will list the things that have made me question that 2 people were there:
--I see ankle in the gif (thread 2 post 135) I see boots in every other video. Did this person take their boots on and off at the church?
--sometimes the person waddles and sometimes they don't
--it might explain why we sometimes see female mannerisms and sometimes male
--could go towards explaining...something I read on twitter but can't talk about here...I wish a msm would pick that up and do a story on it.
That is all I can think of right now. But like I said, I still think it unlikely 2 evil swat wanna be's were there.
Like a shin guard or shin pad.
IMOO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.