Jezbel
Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2011
- Messages
- 420
- Reaction score
- 4
This is slightly off topic, but I followed a case recently, well it actually happened a few years back and the trial took place this year.
A man in his late twenties was on trial for Kidnapping, sexual assault and murder of an 8 year old girl. The laws in Canada are similar to the UK where no evidence is released and not much information is available before the trial. There were a lot of people who thought this man was innocent. If you were to look at his pictures, he also doesnt look like what you might consider
your typical paedophile/murderer. He looks like a young, not bad looking man who seems to take care of his appearance. There were no reports of him being that way with young girls, he did not have a criminal record, he was somewhat of a cad, considered himself a ladies man I think, but still someone you would look at and not suspect. There were a lot of people, he when the trial was going on that did not believe he was guilty still and there was also a lot of information that was not admitted into evidence as it would go towards his character and that is allowed here like in the US. So when the trial came to an end and the jury were sequestered, a tone of information was made available, for instance all of his computer searches, they were sick and disgusting and did involve young girls, necrophilia, etc. After that was released, there really was no denying he did in fact have interest in children, other reports came out too that weren't allowed at trial, all the people who thought he was innocent, soon changed their mind and the jury got it right, even without that evidence.
My point in the a bit long drawn out post is that, you cant assume someone is innocent based on a picture or what little you
have heard about them. I have no doubt there is evidence against MB and we will all have to just be patient and wait for the trial to find out what it is.
On another note regarding the law, Canadian authorities contacted WS and they asked that we refrain from posting, linking and hinting about anything that happens in the case until the trial ban is lifted. I dont know if the UK authorities would do the same, but they may, so be careful
A man in his late twenties was on trial for Kidnapping, sexual assault and murder of an 8 year old girl. The laws in Canada are similar to the UK where no evidence is released and not much information is available before the trial. There were a lot of people who thought this man was innocent. If you were to look at his pictures, he also doesnt look like what you might consider
your typical paedophile/murderer. He looks like a young, not bad looking man who seems to take care of his appearance. There were no reports of him being that way with young girls, he did not have a criminal record, he was somewhat of a cad, considered himself a ladies man I think, but still someone you would look at and not suspect. There were a lot of people, he when the trial was going on that did not believe he was guilty still and there was also a lot of information that was not admitted into evidence as it would go towards his character and that is allowed here like in the US. So when the trial came to an end and the jury were sequestered, a tone of information was made available, for instance all of his computer searches, they were sick and disgusting and did involve young girls, necrophilia, etc. After that was released, there really was no denying he did in fact have interest in children, other reports came out too that weren't allowed at trial, all the people who thought he was innocent, soon changed their mind and the jury got it right, even without that evidence.
My point in the a bit long drawn out post is that, you cant assume someone is innocent based on a picture or what little you
have heard about them. I have no doubt there is evidence against MB and we will all have to just be patient and wait for the trial to find out what it is.
On another note regarding the law, Canadian authorities contacted WS and they asked that we refrain from posting, linking and hinting about anything that happens in the case until the trial ban is lifted. I dont know if the UK authorities would do the same, but they may, so be careful