My first post on the web so please be patient and gentle
MY CASE FACTS AND SUMMARY for april jones trial
This brendan kelly defence QC now has me worried, I can see a mistrial for certain, the police have messed up here and that prosecution was very weak against bridger
LETS NOT MAKE ANY ASSUMPTIONS HERE NOW AND LOOK AT FACTS OF THE CASE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHAT THE PROSECUTION DIDN'T HAVE
No1 - no proof of bones conclusively. THATS VERY UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT OR WHO THEY ARE 100%
No2 - no proof of murder conclusively. IMPOSSIBLE TO SHOW HE MURDERED HER
No3 - no conclusive proof of abduction. THAT WONT STICK BECAUSE OF No 4
No4 - a lying 7 year old main witness who doesnt know colours of cars and sees eyes that arent there. UNRELIABLE AND POTENTIALLY COAXED BY HER MUM WHO SHOWN HER PHOTOS OF LAND ROVERS FOR SOME REASON
No5 - NO FORENSIC INVESTIGATION OF THE ACTUAL CRIME SCENE. MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR FAIL DUE TO A " MISUNDERSTANDING " BY THE POLICE
No6 - no forensic examination of his drains in his house. POTENTIAL EVIDENCE MAY OF BEEN THERE IF BONE WAS FOUND IN BATH PLUG AREA
No7 - disturbance of a crime scene in his house by not wearing protective clothing REGARDLESS of whether they were looking for him, they touched stuff all over that house and in doing so left their own finger prints and foot prints everywhere and DNA there. SPEAKS FOR ITSELF
No 8 - NO BODY - NO CAUSE OF DEATH/NO PROOF OF CRUSHED CHEST TO BACK HIS STORY UP OR PROVE HIM WRONG
No 9 - NO PROOF OF SEXUAL ASSAULT which is what they based the case of murder on with intention to of sexually assaulted her - HAVING PICTURES HOWEVER GRAPHIC OF CHILDREN OF VARIOUS AGES DOESNT MAKE SOMEONE A SEXUAL ASSAULTER BUT IT DOES POTRAY A VERY UNHEALTHY INTEREST
No 10 - No proof of his story/alibi being a lie - THEY WERE POOR IN CROSS EXAMINATION, CONCENTRATED ON PHOTOS TOO MUCH AND SCRAPED THE BARREL WITH TO MANY UNNECCESARY QUESTIONS AND NOT ENOUGH PRESSING RELEVANT ONES - TOO MANY QUESTIONS MISSED AND I BELIEVE EVANS KNEW SHE WAS ONTO A LOSS WITH THAT TRYING TO GET ANSWERS - HE WON THAT BECAUSE DESPITE HER GRILLING HIM HE ACTUALLY DIDNT FALTER THAT BADLY, HE WAS VERY COMPOSED IN COURT ON WEDNESDAY TOO
No 11 - No murder weapon - KNIFE IN FIRE WITH NO DNA ON IT DOESNT PROVE HE MURDERED HER OR DISMEMBERED HER WITH THAT
No 12 - An unmatched 3rd finger print in his bathroom - WHO WAS THAT IF IT WASNT APRIL OR MARK? SOMEONE ELSE WAS POTENTIALLY THERE?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
WHAT DID THEY HAVE ON HIM
No 1 - Aprils blood in his house albeit a very small amount - PROVES SHE WAS THERE BUT DID SHE DIE THERE OR WAS SHE KILLED THERE OR CAN THEY SAFELY PROVE SHE WAS MURDERED THERE BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF BLOOD LOST? NO CLEARLY THEY CANT
No 2 - A confession he killed her by accident, which came from a compulsive liar - IS HE COVERING IT UP FOR SOMEONE ELSE TOO, IS HE TRUTHFUL IN HIS ADMITTANCE?
No 3 - Bone fragments in his house which havent been proven to be aprils - sorry, could anything that in that case - RUBBISH EVIDENCE AND SERIOUSLY SCRAPING THE BARREL IF THEY COULDNT CONCLUDE IT WAS APRIL
No 4 - A laptop with numerous indecent images of young children - POTENTIAL PAEDO MAYBE BUT NOT PROVEN AS OF YET AND NO PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS FOR THAT
No 5 - Knife from a fire - doesnt prove a thing that because no DNA on it - IT WAS A KITCHEN KNIFE NOT A BONING KNIFE TOO, TRYING TO MAKE IT MORE DRAMATIC BECAUSE HE WORKED IN A SLAUGHTERHOUSE
_____________________________________________________________
If you had never heard of this case and just read all that above ,what would you think of the crown prosecutons case for a trial???
I would tell them to go back and do a proper job before I authorise charges!!!!
I can see an acquittal coming up here on technicalities and this QC specialises in them.
An abrupt and surprising end to todays proceedings with defence all of a sudden ending their evidence
