My experience with diggers is that they can be very precise. Eg. The point of the bucket gets put in at the top of the pile and can nudge the material forward or back then the material will come away. Also this digger may have been cleaned beforehand so no chance of decontamination. Could be why they could not just use a different one. This is a potential crime scene after all.so the digger is grabbing bucketfuls of rubbish from the dump and placing it on the ground to be searched, must be a better way of doing it then this to preserve DNA , this needs to be done by hand, I will not say what might happen if that digger picks up a body but it will not be intact after six months, the chances of determine course of death will be almost zero, they need to find the body intact as much as possible , IMO
Hey everyone.
Please see my post on this thread in the Parking Lot:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...cebook-Live-Q-amp-A-4&p=13246221#post13246221
:tyou:
Actually if it was general waste, that for me throws doubt on his being in the bin. General assorted waste is likely to be considerably heavier than paper and cardboard.
The whole 'wrong bin, wrong weight' etc is frustrating but the fact remains that he was most likely in one bin or the other. How did he get there is the question?
Was he incapable of calling for help? Was he injured before going into the bin lorry?
The general waste bin goes some way to explain how he got through the process unnoticed.
But I still don't get why he chose to climb in a smelly dirty bin to go to sleep, when his car was not far away the only explanation to me now is Corrie must of been put in the bin unconscious, In my mind if he willingly climbed in to a bin to sleep it would have had to been a clean recycling bin.
He's was a good looking lad not a vagrant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As the story is now in the news, can we revert back to this thread?
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/754247/nicola-mckeague-corrie-mckeague-missing-wrong-bin/amp/
Corrie’s uncle, Tony Wringe, also hit out at Suffolk police, writing: “We begged the police to search the tip. They said no and never.
“Nicola pleaded with them to at least secure the area. Again, no, they wanted to hand it back to the operator and that they did not feel there was any future value in holding the site.
“Through luck or judgement the waste site operator did not dump much/any more waste on that area of the tip - this was nothing to do with the police."
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/754247/nicola-mckeague-corrie-mckeague-missing-wrong-bin/amp/
How much of this is correct?
Taking statements as fact without verifying them is not a investigation though is it. You follow leads based on incorrect information. Ultimately SP are responsible for the 'errors' no matter what they were told.The bin man and bin company have a lot to answer for. How was it possible to have so many wrong answers initially? Wrong bin, Wrong bin lorry, Wrong weight, Wrong waste type, Wrong destination for rubbish. It doesn't make sense, none of it. All of the above should have been easy to confirm by the Police within a few days I thought we had ANPR cameras everywhere for a reason, as well as tachographs, vehicle trackers, mobile phone pings etc etc.
But I still don't get why he chose to climb in a smelly dirty bin to go to sleep, when his car was not far away the only explanation to me now is Corrie must of been put in the bin unconscious, In my mind if he willingly climbed in to a bin to sleep it would have had to have been a clean recycling bin.
He's was a good looking lad not a vagrant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.