UK - (Former prince) Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

  • #1,441
Epsteins feet??

How do you know?

Three fully dressed adults together in a room.

The ‘Russian’ girl was 26 and she was to have dinner with the Prince.

Yes, truly gross. Not.

Just another nothing burger from the Daily Fail.
 
  • #1,442
Andrew certainly was not the only high profile name connected to Epstein yet he has been the only one to have been named and continually in the press. He has had everything he valued removed and it has been recorded that people are concerned about his mental health.
Every one seems to extol mental health but ignores it when it does not fit their agenda.
Agenda?

What was his ?
Young girls, ick

His own fault
 
  • #1,443
Agenda?

What was his ?
Young girls, ick

His own fault

Please define ‘young girls’.

If you mean children, he has never been accused of any form of child abuse.

If you mean young women of legal age, they are adults and able to give consent.

My understanding is that Prince Andrew was involved with many young women.

Not a crime, not a perversion.
 
  • #1,444
Just another nothing burger from the Daily Fail.

Google is full of articles about the matter.
American, Australian and many more.
In fact,
Press/Media ALL OVER THE WORLD
have a field day with new E.'s files revelations.

Oh, by the way,
DM name is "Mail"
No need to go ballistic and offensive towards MSM whose job is to report things.

JMO
 
Last edited:
  • #1,445
Google is full of articles about the matter.
American, Australian and many more.
In fact,
Press/Media ALL OVER THE WORLD
have a field day with new E. revelations.

Oh, by the way,
DM name is "Mail"
No need to go ballistic and offensive towards MSM whose job is to report things.

JMO

Thank you.

You’ve just proven my point.

This is a media pile on against Prince Andrew (AMW).

Media driven anti Monarchist nonsense. IMO, MOO
 
  • #1,446
Thank you.

You’ve just proven my point.

This is a media pile on against Prince Andrew (AMW).

Media driven anti Monarchist nonsense. IMO, MOO

Does this mean the whole world 🌎
is conspiring against a former prince?? 🤔

Hahahahahahaha 😂🤣😂

Phew!!!
What megalomania!!!
This is hilarious 😆
Hehehehe
 
  • #1,447
@JDG

I’m referring to the photo in Epsteins private plane of his bare feet inside Maxwells bra. She has her hands on his feet.
 
  • #1,448
@JDG

I’m referring to the photo in Epsteins private plane of his bare feet inside Maxwells bra. She has her hands on his feet.

Oh, my apologies.

Your comment about towels, tables and feet seemed to indicate the picture of a person sitting with their feet up on a table.

I wondered how you could identify someone from their bare feet.

I have not seen any picture as you’ve described.
 
  • #1,449
Oh, my apologies.

Your comment about towels, tables and feet seemed to indicate the picture of a person sitting with their feet up on a table.

I wondered how you could identify someone from their bare feet.

I have not seen any picture as you’ve described.

No worries. I didn’t elaborate and should have. I will see if I can find the photo. He has his legs stretched out like the above picture.
 
  • #1,450
IMG_1993.webp
 
  • #1,451
  • Like
Reactions: JDG
  • #1,452
  • #1,453
Disturbing new images released as part of last night's Epstein files appear to show Andrew Mountbatten Windsor crouching on all fours over a female lying on the floor's Epstein files appear to show Andrew Mountbatten Windsor crouching on all fours over a female lying on the floor

Disturbing new images released as part of last night's Epstein files appear to show Andrew Mountbatten Windsor crouching on all fours over a female lying on the floor

In the three images, a man who appears to be the former Prince, can be seen crouching over the person who is sprawled face up with their arms spread out

In the three images, a man who appears to be the former Prince, can be seen crouching over the person who is sprawled face up with their arms spread out

It is unclear where the images where taken and no further context is given

It is unclear where the images where taken and no further context is given

Omg, is she passed out? Her hands look very small.

Why would he allow a pic to be taken of him there? He had to know, didn't he?
 
  • #1,454
Please define ‘young girls’.

If you mean children, he has never been accused of any form of child abuse.

If you mean young women of legal age, they are adults and able to give consent.

My understanding is that Prince Andrew was involved with many young women.

Not a crime, not a perversion.
Gross defending

Any involvement with Epstein is disturbing
 
  • #1,455
Why did they film themselves???
Is it some kind of exhibitionism?? 😵‍💫
Jeez!

A picture paints a thousand words. In this clip it was a moving picture.
 
  • #1,456
Omg, is she passed out? Her hands look very small.

Why would he allow a pic to be taken of him there? He had to know, didn't he?
Hubris, ego? Money & title making him untouchable ?
Maybe just not very smart?
 
  • #1,457
Supposedly a dump is coming. Millions.


 
  • #1,458
  • #1,459
Link not cooperating
 
  • #1,460

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
65
Guests online
2,465
Total visitors
2,530

Forum statistics

Threads
639,137
Messages
18,738,648
Members
244,600
Latest member
solstuna
Back
Top