UK - (Former prince) Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

[Inthedetails]

Definition of SHUN

to avoid deliberately and especially habitually… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

If you do not have interactions/cross paths with someone, how does shunning them work?

You cannot really avoid someone you’ve never met/known.

I'm not assuming any of the perps care if I shun them, lol.

I mean elites shunning disgusting elites. They don't need a conviction to keep them out of their circles and influence.

jmo

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

Former Prince Andrew leaves his Windsor home as Britain's royals seek distance from Epstein revelations

He lost his duties, then his titles and then his home: The next steps in the downfall of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are less clear.

www.nbcnews.com

LONDON — Former Prince Andrew has moved out of his sprawling home in Windsor, it has been widely reported by British media, as fresh revelations in the newly-released Epstein files throw up more challenges and embarrassment for Britain’s royals.

Now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has become a persistent headache for King Charles III, who stripped his brother of his princely title in October and ordered him to leave his residence, the Royal Lodge, part of the Crown Estate.

And while Britain’s politicians typically steer away from direct criticism of royals, over the weekend Prime Minister Keir Starmer took the practically unprecedented step of calling on Mountbatten-Windsor to testify before Congress about his dealings with Epstein.

Mountbatten-Windsor, who continues to deny any wrongdoing, has moved to a home on the Sandringham estate, privately owned by Charles, in the east of England. The move generates distance, both literally and symbolically, placing him 140 miles away from the royals' historical seat of power in Windsor, where his neighbors included the heir to the throne, Prince William...

 

[303gmf]

If there was any solid proof, I believe he would have been charged by now.

If anyone is ‘buying silence’ that is also a crime.

But you need proof.

Photos tell a story, proof is hidden for now.
High hopes it’s all out in the open soon, ALL of these men

 

[lisasimpson2010]

If there was any solid proof, I believe he would have been charged by now.

If anyone is ‘buying silence’ that is also a crime.

But you need proof.

Only 2% of all rapes reported to the police result in charges. Is it your belief that 98% of all rapes reported the police are lies?


You are entitled to your own belief of course but your belief is not supported by either UK law, or by statistical analysis or historical analysis of rape charges.

The BRF are legally above the law. There is absolutely zero chance any royal would ever be investigated by the British police because they are basically the Met Police's boss, and the BRF also control the passing of laws including negotiating for themselves to be legally exempt from laws designed to protect others from abuse.

Andrew has been accused of rape by multiple women, and is proven to have maintained a close long-term relationship with one of the worst sex traffickers of all time, a friendship he maintained after the latter's conviction. There are photos proving he had interactions with the woman who accused him of rape. There is zero motivation or possibly gain for women to make a false rape allegation one of the most powerful and protected men in my country. He has refused to speak to police, and made public statements in his defence which were later proven to be lies.