FOXINBOX

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2018
Messages
355
Reaction score
936
  • #1
I do a lot of meandering around the internet, and as I am forced to be an armchair researcher, I rely on Open Source information. Now the UK has a Freedom of Information Act. You apply, say, for information on the murder of Eileen Pooley in 1968 i.e 52 years ago. It's a case in which the police not only found the offender, but took him to trial, the trial was reported in the national press, the guy was found guilty, sentenced, and the case was closed. Somebody (Not me) applied for information on the case under this law. They got zilch, the whole caboodle had been redacted. My question is, WHY? What possible harm could there be in revealing more details? They can still do a Keep Back on items of information that might cause distress to any surviving relations. Is it an administrative Get Out or have they literally lost the info?
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
1,421
Total visitors
1,491

Forum statistics

Threads
646,342
Messages
18,858,281
Members
245,991
Latest member
Adrians_mon
Top