- Joined
- Jan 22, 2016
- Messages
- 4,618
- Reaction score
- 8,059
I shall reserve judgement on this because the article talks about house building and its therefore not clear whether the term is intended to cover all dwellings or just houses. I know that sprinkler systems are not required in individual houses unless they are to be let out as HMOs (Houses in Multipe Occupation - where rooms are let out individually and facilities such as bathrooms, kitchen and livings rooms are shared space. In HMOs it's also required that all doors be self-closing and fire-resistant.
Even if sprinkler systems are not required in tower blocks they should at least be included in any refurbishment of older properties where those properties are not built to current standards. The decision not to include one in this case is down to the management company which apparently was responsible for specifying the refurbishment project. I would guess that a decision was taken to spend the money on other facilities or amenities instead of sprinklers.
I've read that the cladding which was added at the refurbishment last year was intended to provide insulation as well as aesthetic appeal, so may have been a higher priority as an environmenta/ or energy saving measure than the fire systems.
The cost of the project was apparently a little under £10m, not the £20m I mentioned earlier in this thread. Obviously there's a maximum budget for every project like this and certain aspects of work prioritised over others.
Not saying this is the case, but it may be.