I think police may have stated, back in the beginning, that there was no evidence of sexual assault, and that's been misinterpreted by journalists.??? A victim is found naked and there is near-immediate rule out that it wasn't sexual??
Wut?
IMO many journalists don't understand the subtleties of crime or police investigations. And yet they are the ones who filter the information we get. So often it gives the impression that police are the problem, but really it's the media interpretation.