I feel confused about this too. If she went there to perhaps post some of his belongings and intended going back to her car, how did she end up in his van which I assume was parked outside his home and her car being parked close by (I presume) leads the trail right back to him. The police did know right away they needed sightings and confirmation of where his van went that morning so that is obvious but I all I mean is it's a bit sloppy in that respect if he intended to kidnap which was a word the police used for his initial arrest then he knew he'd be in the frame. So was it premeditated/luring or not on his part i.e. say if he did give her a certain amount of time to bring something of his back to him "or else" type of thing.
I feel like I read somewhere early on that she parked on Lidl. If she did that and she wanted to walk up to the property and him to not realise she was there by parking outside? Maybe opting for walking up and away quickly in an attempt not to alert him she is there with the car pulling up outside the window and to avoid an argument or interaction with him.
Typing that out, now has me thinking that he was in the back of the van and dragged her in. There's a possible scenario for kidnapping. Also explains the luring and stuff she posted. That's if the stuff was posted through his letterbox.
Did she post something through his door and then something(s) through another address or just one letterbox but we don't know if it was his?
