That's what I'd be saying too if I was doorstepped by the Daily Mail et al. About anything.Her husband David, who is now 86, said: 'I have nothing to say on the matter'
Wow just wow!
That's what I'd be saying too if I was doorstepped by the Daily Mail et al. About anything.Her husband David, who is now 86, said: 'I have nothing to say on the matter'
Wow just wow!
...The other thing that makes me wonder is that it was reported in '82 they ran a piggery and I was wondering what condition the bones were in when recovered? They were in a bag but were they a complete skeleton or only partial?
Perhaps they had a hired farm hand. I don't know whether they did or not, but it would be a common practice to have hired assistance.
I wonder if he will be saying the same thing to LE. What a weird situation if it is her - that's 37 years. Someone put those bones in the bag. Could there still be DNA or fingerprints or hair/fibres? I don't suppose it would last that long would it?That's what I'd be saying too if I was doorstepped by the Daily Mail et al. About anything.
I am really happy when a cold case like this gets resolved (hopefully). But what about the statute of limitations? How many years it is in the UK for murder? i remember a case like this is Spain, and since the limitation is 20 years the guy got free anyway.
I think that the UK does not have a statute of limitations on serious crimes.
“No official statute of limitations on criminal cases,”—which are the only kind we’re talking about, here.
Statute of limitations
Admittedly, not everyone knew about not having to wait until reporting someone missing, especially back then.Mr Venables told the Worcester Evening News in May 1982 how he had woken one morning to find his wife gone.
Describing how he had spent 48 hours anxiously waiting by the phone for news, he added: 'She has never done anything like this before and I haven't the faintest idea what has happened to her
One villager said: 'I remember well at the time, the police came along and they were looking through all the barns, and going through the hay.
They were looking for this woman about 48 hours after she disappeared. That went on for a while, and they had a helicopter up looking
Does that mean he did not report her missing for 48 hours ?
Rather limited reporting, so it is not clear.
Admittedly, not everyone knew about not having to wait until reporting someone missing, especially back then.
I think that the UK does not have a statute of limitations on serious crimes.
“No official statute of limitations on criminal cases,”—which are the only kind we’re talking about, here.
Statute of limitations
I'd be straight to the police if a loved one vanished, regardless of perceived protocol!
Mr Venables told the Worcester Evening News in May 1982 how he had woken one morning to find his wife gone.
Describing how he had spent 48 hours anxiously waiting by the phone for news, he added: 'She has never done anything like this before and I haven't the faintest idea what has happened to her
One villager said: 'I remember well at the time, the police came along and they were looking through all the barns, and going through the hay.
They were looking for this woman about 48 hours after she disappeared. That went on for a while, and they had a helicopter up looking
Does that mean he did not report her missing for 48 hours ?
Rather limited reporting, so it is not clear.
I wonder if he will be saying the same thing to LE. What a weird situation if it is her - that's 37 years. Someone put those bones in the bag. Could there still be DNA or fingerprints or hair/fibres? I don't suppose it would last that long would it?
I don't think any of that has been released, only that it is a female. The fact the remains/bones are in a bag only really indicates it was not an accident IMO.Just found this case. The husband is of course always (or in most cases) a person of interest, but it could have been different too. I wait for the dna tests to come back and keep an open mind for now.
Do we know whether only bones were put in the bag or a whole body (that disintegrated over time, leaving only the skeleton)? If there's no indication of decomposition having taken place in the bag, where was the body stored previously?
The bag will be as interesting to LE as the bones themselves.
DNA inside bones and hair can remain for a very long time, fingerprints not.
How was it established that the bones are many years old, and not a more recent death? Do we know that? I might have overlooked it ...