Found Deceased UK - Libby Squire, 21, last seen outside Welly club, Hull, 31 Jan 2019 #11 *ARREST*

[Vermont24]

Where's that come from??

Hull police at Raglan Street house in search for missing Libby

 

[alfiedug]

Where's that come from??

Hull news live been there since 10.00 today

 

[Joolz1975]

Hull news live been there since 10.00 today

Yeh just seen it.

Wonder what they are looking for.

Is it PR house or another property?

 

[Vermont24]

Yeh just seen it.

Wonder what they are looking for.

Is it PR house or another property?

PR's house.

 

[Joolz1975]

PR's house.

You would think that would have been searched fully by now wouldn't you, unless they have new information.

But then again, Tia Sharp.

 

[Chester]

So really what it means they know PR was home by 3am. It that how we take this ?

It's a good guess but we don't know.

 

[Scorpiette]

You would think that would have been searched fully by now wouldn't you, unless they have new information.

But then again, Tia Sharp.

Perhaps PR has given them information at last?

 

[Joolz1975]

Perhaps PR has given them information at last?

You would hope so wouldn't you.

Not sure how likely that is though.

 

[alfiedug]

You would hope so wouldn't you.

Not sure how likely that is though.

Police seen with a tool box
Our reporter at the scene said: “The CSI and police have arrived back at the house.

“One of the officers appears to have been carrying a tool box into the house.”

 

[bos]

Hull police at Raglan Street house in search for missing Libby

I think it’s more likely part of the 28 day review. Although reviewing info daily, in long term missing persons cases they have a more senior detective review at 28 days, 3 months, 6 months.

IMO, although Raglan St was searched post arrest, I reckon the reviewer has said have you searched the panel here or could such and such a cupboard have a false back etc. I think it’s dotting i s and crossing t s rather than specific intel.

 

[ly502]

Totally agree on that 100%.

I was just talking about coming to harm at the hands of others though.

But without a doubt I agree with you.

It's same as drunk drivers nobody makes them get behind the wheel spannered.

Everybody should be responsible for their own safety and take precautions.

In an ideal world they would

Perhaps someone replied to this already, but...there are other scenarios that could cause one (not just Libby) to be in this state of intoxication/incapacity. It is not uncommon for people to slip something into drinks. I live in the second safest state in the US and we have a rash of this happening right now...and not just to young single women. It is happening to women who are on dates with their husbands...you just never know. Also, if she was on any medications (psychiatric or otherwise), this could easily have enhanced the effects of alcohol. And, when you are on these medications, reactions can be unpredictable. One day, you can drink while taking medication and you are fine. the next day, maybe you skipped lunch and you have a much more severe reaction. So, we cannot always assume that the person drinking is the only responsible party.

And I am not trying to deny the fact that many young people binge drink. I am completely aware. I just don't want to jump to conclusions in any case - not just this one.

 

[Vermont24]

I think it’s more likely part of the 28 day review. Although reviewing info daily, in long term missing persons cases they have a more senior detective review at 28 days, 3 months, 6 months.

IMO, although Raglan St was searched post arrest, I reckon the reviewer has said have you searched the panel here or could such and such a cupboard have a false back etc. I think it’s dotting i s and crossing t s rather than specific intel.

I think that's a really good point. I can't imagine how methodical a house search in a case like this must be.

 

[Sally4x]

Perhaps someone replied to this already, but...there are other scenarios that could cause one (not just Libby) to be in this state of intoxication/incapacity. It is not uncommon for people to slip something into drinks. I live in the second safest state in the US and we have a rash of this happening right now...and not just to young single women. It is happening to women who are on dates with their husbands...you just never know. Also, if she was on any medications (psychiatric or otherwise), this could easily have enhanced the effects of alcohol. And, when you are on these medications, reactions can be unpredictable. One day, you can drink while taking medication and you are fine. the next day, maybe you skipped lunch and you have a much more severe reaction. So, we cannot always assume that the person drinking is the only responsible party.

On a very early post on here someone said that Libby’s mum had indicated that she took Diazepam. But when I was young I got in that state of intoxication very easily. I was a student nurse and got up to all sorts whilst that drunk and there is also a lot I don’t remember because I was so drunk. Students get drunk and some of them get very drunk.

 

[ly502]

My co-worker (a teacher!) was found guilty of 2 counts of exposure and 4 of voyeurism which came under category 1 and he had 3 years conditional discharge and supervision and enrolment inn a sex offenders course. I haven't heard any evidence that the charges against PR are any higher than a category 3, so I wouldn't expect the sentence to even be as severe as that.

What about the trespassing and burglary though? Do we know where those fall? That shows a boldness that crosses another line.

 

[PaddyOreally?]

Perhaps PR has given them information at last?

I don't know ,I don't see why he would ever say anything to do with the ls case? Best to keep quiet surely for him?

 

[Chester]

What about the trespassing and burglary though? Do we know where those fall? That shows a boldness that crosses another line.

At the very light end of the offence scale.

 

[Chester]

I don't know ,I don't see why he would ever say anything to do with the ls case? Best to keep quiet surely for him?

I doubt he has said anything.

 

[TheCasual]

Do we actually know Raglan Street is actually being searched in relation to Libby? Or could it be the other crimes he may of committed?

 

[LucyRocket]

What about the trespassing and burglary though? Do we know where those fall? That shows a boldness that crosses another line.

Trespass isn't a charge against him, as trespass is a civil, not criminal, offence. However the judge did word it that he had entered as a trespasser to commit burglary. Again small burglaries of this nature would never normally result in a custodial sentence, but I have the feeling they are trying to maximize all possibilities of this with what they currently have. For example, in the case I mentioned, the perpetrator followed a lone woman in a car park, in his vehicle, masturbating, while driving alongside her, as slowly as she was walking. On two separate occasions, different women who were strangers to him. He was charged with 'exposure' whereas PR has been charged with outraging public decency, which sounds a lot worse. I think that they might try to use the fact that there are multiple offences to evidence that he is a risk to the public and justify handing him time in custody

 

[LucyRocket]

At the very light end of the offence scale.

Thanks. I should have left it to you. Mine is a farrrrrrrr more long- winded answer, but says exactly the same thing I see what my ex complained about now