UK - Lin, 45, & Megan Russell, 6, Chillenden, Kent, 9 July 1996

  • #241
I think this is another one of those cases where people confuse ‘things that make someone an interesting suspect’ with ‘evidence that they did the crime’, isn’t it.

Stone’s conviction has never sat right with me. But I don’t think he’ll ever be released. The public just doesn’t seem to have the appetite for miscarriage of justice cases anymore. My theory is the MOJ movement back in the day was almost *too* successful - some of the men being freed were either probably actually guilty, or if innocent then not exactly individuals the public could warm to. Meanwhile the state grew tired of seeing police and the justice system being (often rightly) torn to shreds, and set about rigging the game in their favour again.

Unfortunately for Stone he just missed the bus.

I watched the BBC documentary on this case again last night - it’s available on iPlayer for anyone that hasn’t seen it - and it’s difficult for me to imagine the corporation making such a programme today. Which is a shame as it’s excellent.
Not sure I agree RE BBC:


That was made last year.

Stone's problem is he was arrested during a time when police stitched people up and we didn't have the cameras/phones etc to help provide alibis and evidence.

The CPS should not be allowed to prosecute for murder based solely on a "confession".
 
  • #242
The difference there though is surely that Malkinson had been freed - in that documentary, the BBC are telling the story of his wrongful conviction.

I searched the BBC’s website and the earliest article I could find mentioning AM was from 2023. Probably because it’s a lot easier to talk about convictions that have been quashed than it is to suggest that someone has been the victim of a miscarriage of justice - particularly if, as in Stone’s case, that someone isn’t palatable and is doing time for child murder. JMO, I think the BBC is a much more timid organisation today than it was a decade ago.

That said, I hadn’t realised, when I previously posted, that the CCRC are still looking at Stone’s case. Ignoring that the CCRC clearly isn’t fit for purpose, perhaps he still has a glimmer of hope?
 
  • #243
  • #244
  • #245
Stone was a alleged heroin addict, so it fitted the prosecution case that the culprit asked for money.
From all accounts the family were compliant, and said they could get more money from the house.

I am guessing, once Lin obviously realised there was far more to this than mere robbery, she told Josie to run home to get help.

In my view, the culprit used robbery as a smokescreen. He was there to kill.
Exactly this. ‘He asked for money which fits with Stone’. Absolute nonsense.
He asked for money to appear less threatening and to get compliance. His intention was always to kill, without a shadow of a doubt.
Stone is 100% innocent. Bellfield torching the girlfriend’s car is a huge coincidence / red flag.
Statistically, how many females are murdered with hammers by strangers? Very, very few.
How many killers have the anger to kill a mum
In front of her kids. Very few but I feel Bellfield falls into that camp.
 
  • #246
I think that's the same documentary as the one shown on channel 5 three years ago.

Ah yes sorry I was confused by the article.

I have now watched it, it doesn't really cover any new ground than the bbc documentary made in 2017.

Except Levi's girlfriend is interviewed and gives him what she reckons is an iron clad alibi for the day of the murder. She claims to remember the entire day in detail because it was her birthday and apparently he never left her side.
 
  • #247
I think that's the same documentary as the one shown on channel 5 three years ago.
I got quite excited for half a second...
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
242
Guests online
2,108
Total visitors
2,350

Forum statistics

Threads
637,083
Messages
18,709,317
Members
244,041
Latest member
talim
Back
Top