- Joined
- Oct 27, 2016
- Messages
- 2,361
- Reaction score
- 10,686
The Southport Inquiry: Phase 1 report
Phase 1 report of the inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the Southport attack of 29 July 2024.
Link to the report on gov uk
That is, IMO, what is usually trotted out in these cases, then the same thing happens again. IMO no lessons will be learned and we'll be discussing another terrible case like this in the future. JMO."Lessons will be learnt"??![]()
I disagree- the report so far is well written and clear, whilst also empathetic to those involved who were responsible for subsequent actions. There are a lot of calm and attainable recommendations in this report, that may help in future. It’s also worth noting some of the response to this event was based on the inquiry and its response to the Manchester bombing- and that change in response did help in this situation.That is, IMO, what is usually trotted out in these cases, then the same thing happens again. IMO no lessons will be learned and we'll be discussing another terrible case like this in the future. JMO.
The parents were clearly in denial about their son, but I don't know what offence they could realistically be charged with.Hopefully they name and shame everyone involved.
Ideally his parents should be jailed too but won't be as they were only morally wrong.
I don't agree with you. As a parent, if your son goes off the rails, "incident after incident", then.. as a parent you remain responsible. Even hiding kitchen knifes, or tell my neighbours. I would be the opperhand in that. And with the dad, being a black belt, how pathetic are you, when you can't even control your son??The issue is even without him buying and hoarding knives, they are readily available. A kitchen knife is all he needed. The parents absolutely should have reported it, but I'm not sure they could have prevented the outcome sadly. The other agencies involved need to be held accountable for their part too. IMO
I don't agree with you. As a parent, if your son goes off the rails, "incident after incident", then.. as a parent you remain responsible. Even hiding kitchen knifes, or tell my neighbours. I would be the opperhand in that. And with the dad, being a black belt, how pathetic are you, when you can't even control your son??
They knew about it and let their son continue his murder obsession. Young girls have been slaughtered.
Families who are not allowed to experience birthdays, Christmas, graduations, and so on.
I don't feel any compassion at all for that family.
They were given all, shelter, education, even BBC broadcast and so much more..
Its moo, as a single parent.
Its so sick, Imo.It seems they were treated with kids gloves as immigrants.
The same happened in Sara Sharif case.
Nobody intervened for fear of being accused of racism.
Even as her cries were heard in the whole neighborhood.
![]()
I don't agree with you. As a parent, if your son goes off the rails, "incident after incident", then.. as a parent you remain responsible. Even hiding kitchen knifes, or tell my neighbours. I would be the opperhand in that. And with the dad, being a black belt, how pathetic are you, when you can't even control your son??
They knew about it and let their son continue his murder obsession. Young girls have been slaughtered.
Families who are not allowed to experience birthdays, Christmas, graduations, and so on.
I don't feel any compassion at all for that family.
They were given all, shelter, education, even BBC broadcast and so much more..
Its moo, as a single parent.
Obviously, whether AR's parents should be locked up and what for is being commented on elsewhere. I've seen it pointed out that recently in Scotland a man was found guilty of culpible homicide (the equivalent of manslaughter in Scots law) in relation to the death of his girlfriend, even though she had committed suicide by jumping off a bridge. His actions we judged to have been responsible for her decision to kill herself.The parents were clearly in denial about their son, but I don't know what offence they could realistically be charged with.
I’m not convinced locking them up is going to achieve anything- I am sure they carry the guilt of what their child did. It would be nice for them to become advocates to get things changed to prevent this happening again, but I believe they fear for their own safety- so it is unlikely they would adopt a public advocacy role to prevent knife and weapon sales and promote safer internet use.Obviously, whether AR's parents should be locked up and what for is being commented on elsewhere. I've seen it pointed out that recently in Scotland a man was found guilty of culpible homicide (the equivalent of manslaughter in Scots law) in relation to the death of his girlfriend, even though she had committed suicide by jumping off a bridge. His actions we judged to have been responsible for her decision to kill herself.
![]()
Man jailed for killing wife who jumped from bridge
Lee Milne was sentenced to eight years for being responsible for his wife Kimberly's death, in the first case of its kind in Scotland.www.bbc.co.uk
Could a similar argument be made with regard to AR's parents for a charge of manslaughter (perhaps by gross negligence) under English law? Probably not, looking at the CPS guidance for GNM. In order to prove the offence, the prosecution must establish the following elements:
"a) The defendant owed a duty of care to the deceased;
b) By a negligent act or omission the defendant was in breach of the duty which he owed to the deceased;
c) The negligent act or omission was a cause of the death; and
d) The negligence, which was a cause of the death, amounts to gross negligence and is therefore a crime;"
The problem here is a), because the CPS guidance goes on to state under 'Duty of Care' -
"There is no general duty of care owed by one citizen to another and there is a "sharp distinction between acts and omissions" - Lord Mustill in Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. Unless there is a pre-existing duty of care, a failure to act, even if it results in death, cannot amount to GNM."
If AR had killed his brother, then perhaps a case could could be made to prosecute the parents for GNM, but as the victims had no connection to AR's parents, there doesn't seem to be a case for GNM under English law.
The other type of involuntary manslaughter under English law is Unlawful Act Manslaughter. Here there has to be an unlawful intentional act, not merely an omission. What unlawful intentional act have AR's patents supposed to have committed?