Really hope this isn't going to turn into a other 'rough sex gone wrong' story. The dropped rape charge suggests they can't prove if sex was consentual or not. I'm also going with them knowing each other
MOO

MOO
From the link:Some more information here, the poor parents
Man, 29, arrested over 'murder' of woman, 23 | Daily Mail Online
From the link:
_____
A man has been charged with murder after a 23-year-old woman was found dead in a country lane following an online date.
Human resources adviser Megan Newborough was reported missing when she failed to return from the meeting on Friday evening.
Her frantic parents used tracking software to find her mobile phone discarded in a hedgerow on Saturday evening and police were called.
However, Miss Newborough’s body was discovered in the early hours of Sunday six miles away in a rural lane outside the village of Woodhouse Eaves in Leicestershire.
Hey no problem at all, I am happy to try and assist as best i canSome time today he should be charged with murder or released on bail I guess. Though the later rape charge will give police more time to secure evidence I guess. Maybe someone here with better knowledge of how things work could confirm, eg @Angleterre (sorry to bother you!)
Thank you @Angleterre A lot more complex than I imaginedHey no problem at all, I am happy to try and assist as best i can
Firstly, taking the Murder out of the equation for just one moment, let me say that RAPE is the most difficult case to prove and the most difficult to disprove because as others have said, he will likely say it was consensual and even with a living victim ( I’m so sorry to have to write it that way ), it’s difficult enough but this young woman is not even able to speak for herself and tell her own account of what happened.
Moving onto custody times , it’s 24 hours in police custody with reviews by an Inspector or above , 3 times in those 24. You can be authorised up to 36 hours but that has to be authorised by an officer of the rank of Superintendent or above . At 36 hours you need to consider if you are able to charge and either release or remand in custody or if you need more time to secure abs preserve evidence by questioning . If this is the case abs there are evidential trails that must be followed before the evidence is destroyed or disappears or alibis be proven before witnesses can be approached or witnesses still to be spoken to then you can ask for an extension on the custody clock but this has to be done in a magistrates court before the magistrate. You have to succeed in your explanation to the magistrate as to why you need to complete these actions now and potentially go against the suspects human rights by detaining them so the magistrate has to be satisfied that a custody extension is legal, justified and necessary and proportionate to what is hoping to be achieved. You then have to explain possible times it will take to complete these actions because the magistrate will not give you the full 96 hours maximum detention unless they are 100% satisfied that they are required , even if they grant for example 90 hours if they feel it’s what the enquiries and further questioning will take . But often they realise that it’s a serious offence and the full 96 are required but once that’s all been used up then it’s charge or release . Hope that helps @AcbMurders
There have been a couple of “first date” murders in the UK, including this one where victim and perpetrator met online and booked into a hotel together. Hard to see how a person thinks they can get away with it.
Katie Locke inquest: First-date murderer was talking to 20 women
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.