- Joined
- Apr 4, 2021
- Messages
- 603
- Reaction score
- 2,533
The A&S constabulary's appeal page for Melanie.
Interesting that John Cannan was put forward by witnesses as being sighted near the nightclub that night, even though he was in prison at the time!
Yes, Cannan was definitely under lock and key in 1996. He was interviewed in prison by the Melanie Hall investigators and cleared of any involvement!
The A&S constabulary's appeal page for Melanie.
Interesting that John Cannan was put forward by witnesses as being sighted near the nightclub that night, even though he was in prison at the time!
Indeed. He was incarcerated. The Wikipedia page for Melanie's case suggests that Cannan has not been cleared of links to this case, which is clearly ridiculous.Yes, Cannan was definitely under lock and key in 1996. He was interviewed in prison by the Melanie Hall investigators and cleared of any involvement!
The theory was that Cannan planned the perfect murder with his cellmate, the serial rapist Chris Clark, who was transferred to a hostel in Bath just before Melanie disappeared.Indeed. He was incarcerated. The Wikipedia page for Melanie's case suggests that Cannan has not been cleared of links to this case, which is clearly ridiculous.
Melanie's remains were found after thirteen years, next to a motorway slip road.
I'm amazed she lay undiscovered for that long in a fairly public location.
Who owned/managed that verge and why wasn't it cleaned or cleared for thirteen years?
Did the killer really expect a body to remain hidden there for years?
Are there any visuals of the area where she was found that I’ve missed?The killer must just have been desperate to get rid of the evidence so he trussed up Melanie's remains like that and just dumped them at a place he thought would be safe for at least a while. No ANPR, dash cams or CCTV to worry about then.
Even so I am also amazed that it took so long for her to be found. I suppose whoever manages the motorways, or owned the land (council? leased by private owner to motorway company?) just don't think they need to maintain the verges very often. It probably seemed like a smart place to dump her remains because people don't tend to walk next to slip roads, but still you'd think there would be a periodic litter pick and tidy at least.
Melanie's remains were found after thirteen years, next to a motorway slip road.
I'm amazed she lay undiscovered for that long in a fairly public location.
Who owned/managed that verge and why wasn't it cleaned or cleared for thirteen years?
Did the killer really expect a body to remain hidden there for years?
The killer must just have been desperate to get rid of the evidence so he trussed up Melanie's remains like that and just dumped them at a place he thought would be safe for at least a while. No ANPR, dash cams or CCTV to worry about then.
Even so I am also amazed that it took so long for her to be found. I suppose whoever manages the motorways, or owned the land (council? leased by private owner to motorway company?) just don't think they need to maintain the verges very often. It probably seemed like a smart place to dump her remains because people don't tend to walk next to slip roads, but still you'd think there would be a periodic litter pick and tidy at least.
It does seem a strange place to have left her remains. Scattered underwater would seem more obvious and even if the person who left her remains there expected them to go undiscovered for a long time they surely couldn't have expected them to go undiscovered there forever? JMO
Takes more time and more risk involved? Need a shovel as you say? Lot more effort? If he was panicking and had a car, hiding the remains where he did makes some sort of sense. If he was thinking clearly, not panicking, and had time to plan then there would be better options. His choice of location suggests something about his frame of mind. Maybe he was not planning to kill Melanie, but things escalated in the moment and he lost control, then panicked afterwards. Does that point to a particular type of perpetrator?Why doesn't he just bury her in the forested area a few yards from the slip road?4
As you say, the killer presumably got there in a vehicle and presumably would have had to stop the vehicle on the slip road to deposit the remains. Does anyone know if this slip road would be particularly quiet in the middle of the night 20-30 years ago? It would seem very risky to stop on the slip road to drop the remains there if this spot was not known to be particularly quiet. If someone did know this it would presumably be someone with good local knowledge. Or could the remains have been dropped off when the slip road was known to be closed? Even is it possible that police may have been involved in this crime?Desperate to get rid of the remains, panicking, doesn't know what to do, this is what he came up with in that frame of mind. Was in a car I assume, probably drove there at night when it felt safe and secure. It was a good hiding place - in retrospect, and it should not have been of course - because sadly no one found Melanie for years. Now the police need a hit on the DNA profile they found.
Takes more time and more risk involved? Need a shovel as you say? Lot more effort? If he was panicking and had a car, hiding the remains where he did makes some sort of sense. If he was thinking clearly, not panicking, and had time to plan then there would be better options. His choice of location suggests something about his frame of mind. Maybe he was not planning to kill Melanie, but things escalated in the moment and he lost control, then panicked afterwards. Does that point to a particular type of perpetrator?
I thought the police suspected that Melanie was taken there soon after her murder.AIUI Melanie was found as a bag of bones not as a full skeleton so presumably her remains weren't dumped immediately after she was killed but sometime later so there is surely no reason why the killer would have been in a panic? MOO
If Melanie was taken there as a full body it does seem all the more remarkable that it took so long to discover her remains JMOI thought the police suspected that Melanie was taken there soon after her murder.
I was wondering if scavenging animals could have removed/scattered some of the bones.
The police seem to suspect she was taken to somewhere local, and then deposited in Thornbury, at a spot where the killer could then double back towards Bath.Melanie was abducted in Bath. Where would the killer likely have been travelling from to deposit her remains just north of Bristol?
The police seem to suspect she was taken to somewhere local, and then deposited in Thornbury, at a spot where the killer could then double back towards Bath.
The car enquiries in the case however seem to have pointed towards Wales.
Desperate to get rid of the remains, panicking, doesn't know what to do, this is what he came up with in that frame of mind. Was in a car I assume, probably drove there at night when it felt safe and secure. It was a good hiding place - in retrospect, and it should not have been of course - because sadly no one found Melanie for years. Now the police need a hit on the DNA profile they found.
Takes more time and more risk involved? Need a shovel as you say? Lot more effort? If he was panicking and had a car, hiding the remains where he did makes some sort of sense. If he was thinking clearly, not panicking, and had time to plan then there would be better options. His choice of location suggests something about his frame of mind. Maybe he was not planning to kill Melanie, but things escalated in the moment and he lost control, then panicked afterwards. Does that point to a particular type of perpetrator?